Dirty UK hospitals serving out-of-date poorly stored food

I wrote a letter to the hospital in Brisbane where my friend has been holed up, complaining about serving sandwiches with raw sprouts to sick people – or anyone.

brisbane-hospital-foodThere was some totally unscientific answer about how these sprouts were special because they came from a different place and they disappeared from the sick persons menu for a few weeks.

The sprouts are now back.

Nothing new, food hygiene reports obtained by the Press Association under the UK Freedom of Information Act and data from the UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) concluded that dirty hospitals are serving out-of-date food to patients.

Meals are being prepared in mouldy kitchens, putting vulnerable patients at “high risk” of food poisoning, while others have unclean worktops, food trolleys and sinks.

FSA data also revealed poor rankings for hundreds of care homes and children’s nurseries.

Some 400 hospitals, hospices, care homes, nurseries and school clubs are currently listed as needing “major”, “urgent” or “necessary” improvement.

One care home was infested with cockroaches while another had evidence of rats.

The Patients Association has called the findings “shameful” and “immensely worrying”.

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme – which rates organisations and businesses from zero to five – is run by the FSA and councils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The investigation found:

Eight health and care premises currently have a zero rating – which means urgent improvement is necessary. None are hospitals.

Some 187 have a rating of one – which means major improvement is necessary. Three of these are hospital premises, including the private Priory Hospital in Altrincham, Cheshire (because in the UK, like its bastard child, Australia, private is considered better, except when it comes to the basics)..

hospital-foodAnd 205 are ranked as two – improvement necessary. They include six hospitals and about 100 care homes. Among those given the ranking of two was Glenfield Hospital in Leicester.

At Glenfield Hospital in Leicester, an inspection of its kitchens serving patients found:

Sliced chicken two days past its use-by date (hello, Listeria?).

Staff had created their own date labels for when they thought food should be used, creating a “high risk” for patients who might develop food poisoning (food fraud)).

The experts also found leaking sinks, “inadequate” knowledge among staff about how to handle food safely, and mouldy areas, including the salad preparation room.

Food was being kept in fridges with temperatures up to 13C despite rules saying they should be 5C or below to prevent bacteria developing.

Darryn Kerr, director of facilities at Leicester’s Hospitals, said the organisation was “disappointed” by the ratings.

He said catering services were brought back in-house in May after being run by an external provider.

Parkview Residential Care Home in Bexleyheath, south-east London, was found to have an “infestation of Oriental cockroaches” during an August inspection.

The kitchen was closed voluntarily for the second time following a previous warning and inspectors gave it a zero rating.

Ivy House care home in Derby, which specialises in dementia care, scored zero after inspectors found evidence of rat activity.

Probably more restaurant specific than geographic: Pretty map shows dirtiest places to eat in UK

Alison Millington of Business Insider UK writes the Food Hygiene Rating System (FHRS) gives establishments that serve food – from hospitals to restaurants, takeaways, hotels, and grocery shops –a rating on a scale of 0 to 5, based on factors related to hygiene, to determine which establishments are cleanest and dirtiest.

Bad scores are given for poor practices such as employees not washing their hands properly, the presence of food debris or rodent activity.

Low ratings have even been shown to affect business, with a recent survey by Checkit.com of of 1,000 people from West London finding that 61% of diners wouldn’t eat in a place with a low score.

Content marketing agency Fractl looked at the data, which is collected by the Food Standards Agency, as of May 5, 2016 to compare the average ratings in locations across the UK in order to determine which regions have the best and worst food hygiene.

this-colour-coded-map-suggests-that-in-terms-of-food-safety-more-than-half-of-the-businesses-in-the-uk-have-good-or-higher-hygiene-standards

How the brown rat conquered New York City

Our garage door didn’t work in Kansas, so we parked our car outside.

The cats would bring gifts to the doorstep every morning – a reliably good indicator of what species of rat, squirrel, bird or something else was flourishing that reproductive year.

sq-willard-crispin-glover-rat-nlThe dogs also took a tag-team approach, with the cocker spaniel sniffing out the rabbits nests, and the border-collie-pit-bull mutt finishing them off.

But there was this one time, they missed the rats.

Went to start the car in the morning and it was dead.

Wouldn’t boost.

Took it to the shop and they had a verdict in about 5 minutes.

Rats.

It was starting to get cold that season, and the mechanic said it was common for rats to seek the protection, and sometimes warmth from auto engines, and gnaw away at various wires.

Said he saw it all the time.

Carl Zimmer of the New York Times writes that despite their ubiquity, Rattus norvegicus, otherwise known as the brown rat, remains surprisingly mysterious. Scientists have only a hazy idea of how it went from wild rodent to unwanted human companion.

“They’ll gnaw through walls. They’ll gnaw through wires. They’ll destroy cars,” said Jason Munshi-South, a biologist at Fordham University. “They’ve managed to spread wherever there are humans.”

Now Dr. Munshi-South and his colleagues have completed the first in-depth genetic study of brown rats from around the world. Their story has twists and turns that surprise even the experts.

After spreading slowly for thousands of years, the scientists found, brown rats scampered over much of the planet in just the past three centuries. And once brown rats settle into a new city, the new study suggests, they repel all newcomers — a finding that could have big implications for our health.

Dr. Munshi-South said the study emerged from a simple question: “What is a New York City rat, and where did it come from?”

house-kansasHe contacted researchers around the world to see if he could obtain DNA to compare with that of the rats he captures around New York City. To his surprise, he ended up with samples from hundreds of brown rats, from the Galápagos Islands to Brazil, from New Zealand to Japan.

Instead of simply asking where New York City’s brown rats came from, Dr. Munshi-South realized he might be able to figure out where the world’s brown rats came from.

Emily E. Puckett, a postdoctoral researcher in his lab, analyzed the DNA samples, sorting 314 brown rats from 30 countries into clusters of genetic relatives. Eventually, she was able to determine how different populations of the rats mixed together over time.

Dr. Puckett, Dr. Munshi-South and their colleagues published their findings last week in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

The brown rat is sometimes called the Norway rat, but the new research confirms that the name is a misnomer. Instead, brown rats originated in northern China or Mongolia. Before they became our companions, they fed on wild plants and small animals on cold, open plains.

Farming came relatively late to northern China, but at some point, native brown rats, finding a reliable food supply in their midst, switched to living on farms and in villages.

Dr. Puckett and her colleagues can’t say how long brown rats remained in northern China, but at some point, they started to expand their range. Their first migration, the study suggests, took them to southeastern Asia.

Tanner holds up a freshly-caught rat.

Tanner holds up a freshly-caught rat.

Much later, a wave of brown rats spread northeast, into Japan and Siberia. Another emigrated west, eventually reaching Europe in what appear to have been three major arrivals on the Continent. These rats may have traveled on overland routes, or perhaps hidden on ships that sailed along the coasts of Asia and Europe.

The new study suggests that brown rats were slower to spread around the globe than our other familiars, the black rat and the house mouse. Geography may be the reason: House mice originated in the Fertile Crescent, and black rats in India.

Farming societies and widespread trade arose in those places much earlier than in northern China, giving the black rat and the house mouse early opportunities to travel.

But in the past three centuries, the brown rat has more than made up for lost time.

Brown rats in Alaska and along the Pacific Coast of the United States and Canada can trace much of their ancestry to Russia, Dr. Puckett and her colleagues found. Their ancestors may have stowed away aboard ships that traveled to fur-trapping communities in the New World in the 1700s and early 1800s.

But the brown rats of Europe became the true globe-trotters. As Western European countries colonized other parts of the world, they took the rodents with them.

The brown rats of New York and other Eastern American cities trace their ancestry to those in Western Europe. So do brown rats in South America, Africa, New Zealand, and isolated islands scattered across the Atlantic and Pacific.

Even today, the ports of New York City are visited by rats from around the world.

Nearly 700 NYC restaurant-goers found something gross in their food last year

Yoav Gonen of the New York Post reports restaurant customers have called in a record number of complaints to the city’s 311 hot line for the second year in a row.

mr-creosote-monty-pythonRecords show there were 10,373 complaints to the municipal call center in the most recent fiscal year, which ended June 30 — up from 8,653 the year before.

The top complaints were the discovery of rodents, insects or garbage inside an eatery — with 2,832 such calls, up from 2,213.

New York diners also complained of spoiled food (997), concerns about a restaurant’s letter grade (804) — such as no grade being posted — and bare hands coming in touch with their food (775).

An additional 676 grubsters said they found a foreign object — usually a piece of hair or plastic — in their meal, an 18 percent increase.

The surge came even as the city rated 92.7 percent of the city’s 24,000-plus eateries with a grade of “A” in fiscal 2016, according to the Mayor’s Management Report.

That was close to the 93 percent that got the top grade in fiscal 2015.

Health Department officials didn’t provide data requested by The Post for the number of violations issued to restaurants last year, making it impossible to know whether the complaints spurred a higher number of summonses.

Smart as trees in Sault Ste. Marie: Restaurant grades come to Seattle

The Sault (pronounced Sue) is on my mind today.

barf-o-meter_-dec_-12-216x300-216x3001-216x300-1-216x300-216x300Lots of feedback about the Esposito brothers (Tony and Phil) who hail from Sault Ste. Marie (in Ontario, Canada) and, more importantly, most excellent graduate student Katie, who hails from the Sault, got an undergrad at Guelph, did her Masters research in New Zealand and got her degree from Kansas State.

So when JoNel Aleccia of The Seattle Times e-mailed me to get my take on the county’s proposed restaurant inspection disclosure system, I used it as an excuse to get back in touch with Katie.

It’s taken nearly two years, but King County restaurants will soon start posting storefront signs that display their health-inspection status at a glance, giving diners a new view into food safety.

Exactly what those signs will say, however, is still up to the public to decide.

Starting in January, officials with Public Health — Seattle & King County plan to roll out a long-anticipated public grading system that rates restaurants based on an aggregate score of four recent inspections.

Depending on the results, a restaurant may be ranked excellent, good, fair or needs improvement on signs that could feature smiley-face emoji in shades of green and yellow.

“It’s exciting,” said Becky Elias, Public Health food and facilities section manager. “We feel like this is thorough and evidence-based.”

Local diners can vote on six variations of the placards online by Thursday, Nov. 17.

Elias and her crew originally thought a restaurant-grading system could be in place by the start of 2015, but it took longer than anticipated to get it right, she said.

Local health officials overhauled the system that regularly sends 55 inspectors to review more than 11,000 permanent food businesses and an additional 3,000 temporary sites in King County.

With the help of Daniel E. Ho, a Stanford University law professor who has studied restaurant-rating programs extensively, they refined and standardized the way inspectors make decisions and then came up with placards to convey that information to the public.

Throughout the process, they sought out opinions from everyone involved, including restaurant owners and food-safety advocates. Such collaboration was appreciated, said Patrick Yearout, director of recruiting and training for Ivar’s restaurant company, which operates 25 sites in King County.

Food-safety advocates said they’re pleased that King County is unveiling a new ratings system, but they’re not enthusiastic about the smiley-face signs.

Sarah Schacht, 37, of Seattle, is a two-time victim of E. coli food poisoning who has been lobbying the county to help warn consumers about restaurants with unsatisfactory inspections. She’d prefer to see numeric scores on the new signs, not just emoji.

“If you look at these placard examples, in the end, the information you’re supposed to absorb and make a decision on comes down to the size of the smile on the smiley face,” she said. “I think the options are better than nothing, but they’re problematic.”

seattle-rest-inspect-disclose-nov-16Doug Powell, a former Kansas State University food scientist who runs the food-safety site, barfblog.com, said the proposed King County signs “all seem too busy.” If he had to choose, however, he’d choose options B or D, he said.

“At least they are asking people, which is good,” he added.

Katie and I e-mailed, and she said she preferred C, because it was clearly visible from distance, the colour is prominent, the universal symbol avoids language barriers and has better use of space on the card.

I like B and D because the gauge reminded me of something Katie created years ago while goofing around.

And this is my favorite Tragically Hip song, but no live versions of it.

Filion, K. and Powell, D.A. 2009. The use of restaurant inspection disclosure systems as a means of communicating food safety information. Journal of Foodservice 20: 287-297.

The World Health Organization estimates that up to 30% of individuals in developed countries become ill from food or water each year. Up to 70% of these illnesses are estimated to be linked to food prepared at foodservice establishments. Consumer confidence in the safety of food prepared in restaurants is fragile, varying significantly from year to year, with many consumers attributing foodborne illness to foodservice. One of the key drivers of restaurant choice is consumer perception of the hygiene of a restaurant. Restaurant hygiene information is something consumers desire, and when available, may use to make dining decisions.

Filion, K. and Powell, D.A. 2011. Designing a national restaurant inspection disclosure system for New Zealand. Journal of Food Protection 74(11): 1869-1874
.

The World Health Organization estimates that up to 30% of individuals in developed countries become ill from contaminated food or water each year, and up to 70% of these illnesses are estimated to be linked to food service facilities. The aim of restaurant inspections is to reduce foodborne outbreaks and enhance consumer confidence in food service. Inspection disclosure systems have been developed as tools for consumers and incentives for food service operators. Disclosure systems are common in developed countries but are inconsistently used, possibly because previous research has not determined the best format for disclosing inspection results. This study was conducted to develop a consistent, compelling, and trusted inspection disclosure system for New Zealand. Existing international and national disclosure systems were evaluated. Two cards, a letter grade (A, B, C, or F) and a gauge (speedometer style), were designed to represent a restaurant’s inspection result and were provided to 371 premises in six districts for 3 months. Operators (n = 269) and consumers (n = 991) were interviewed to determine which card design best communicated inspection results. Less than half of the consumers noticed cards before entering the premises; these data indicated that the letter attracted more initial attention (78%) than the gauge (45%). Fifty-eight percent (38) of the operators with the gauge preferred the letter; and 79% (47) of the operators with letter preferred the letter. Eighty-eight percent (133) of the consumers in gauge districts preferred the letter, and 72% (161) of those in letter districts preferring the letter. Based on these data, the letter method was recommended for a national disclosure system for New Zealand.

Hotel Marshfield: Not a John Irving novel but familiar storyline with dozens sick from noro

On 4/19/2016, the Wood County Health Department (WCHD) notified the Wisconsin Division of Public Health (DPH), Communicable Diseases Epidemiology Section (CDES) of two ill individuals who had both attended a company (Company A) banquet event at the Hotel Marshfield in Marshfield, WI on 4/16/16.

hotel-new-hampshireOnset of gastrointestinal symptoms in these individuals began early morning 4/18/2016. Appetizers, snacks, and entrees served during the event were prepared by Hotel Marshfield staff. Cupcakes were purchased from Bakery A, and cookies were provided by Company B. Leftover entrees from the banquet were boxed up immediately after the event and donated to Organization A (12 boxed meals total) where some were eaten by staff and residents of that organization.

Upon recognition of a suspected outbreak, Organization A was asked by WCHD to hold the leftover food in their refrigerator and not serve it to anyone. WCHD collected a list of food and drink items served at the banquet from both the Hotel Marshfield manager and the Employee Relations Officer for Company A. CDES began creation of an investigation questionnaire, as well as an online survey to collect food and hotel exposure information from attendees. WCHD began dissemination of stool kits to ill banquet attendees and Hotel Marshfield employees to submit for laboratory testing.

This investigation identified a foodborne outbreak of norovirus gastroenteritis associated with consuming food from a banquet event held at the Hotel Marshfield banquet facility in Marshfield, WI on 4/16/2016. The causative agent was Norovirus genogroup II.17B (Kawasaki). Confirmed and probable cases were identified among banquet attendees and employees of Hotel Marshfield.

Based on the epidemiologic, laboratory, and environmental evidence gathered during this outbreak, improper food handling by a Hotel Marshfield employee who was infected with norovirus is the most likely cause of this outbreak. Because specific food items were identified that were associated with higher risk of illness and all of these items were served on the same plate, this suggests the ill employee was a chef rather than a server or bartender. The challenge of being short-staffed in the banquet kitchen on the day of the banquet may have contributed to a breakdown in hand hygiene or glove use.

The pattern of illness onset dates and times in the epidemic curve supports the conclusion that exposure to the virus occurred at the same time among banquet attendees and hotel staff. This means that the virus was not introduced to the hotel by an ill banquet attendee. Although one banquet attendee reported becoming ill during the event, the epidemic curve indicates a point source exposure consistent with a foodborne outbreak, rather than the pattern of illnesses typically seen with person-to-person transmission from an ill attendee. Since ill attendees do not come in contact with kitchen staff, outbreaks where both food workers and attendees are ill at the same time generally indicate the food worker was the source, rather than a victim.

Additionally, the same strain of norovirus, norovirus GII.17B (Kawasaki) was isolated from both food workers and banquet attendees. The Kawasaki strain is a rare strain of norovirus only recently introduced to the United States in the last five years.7 In Wisconsin, it tends to be associated with foodborne outbreak settings rather than person-to-person transmission in the community; during 2015- 2016, 62.5% of the outbreaks caused by the Kawasaki strain in Wisconsin were foodborne.8 The rarity of the strain, its recovery from both employees (including Chef A) and attendees, and the fact that the same strain was identified in all norovirus positive specimens support the conclusion the illnesses were all acquired from a single source.

norovirus-qmraChef A reported illness onset at 1:45am on the night of the banquet (4/16/16) while the majority of other illnesses began in the evening of the next day. The length of Chef A’s incubation period (time between exposure and start of symptoms) was 7.75 hours, which is shorter than the range of 10‐50 hours observed during volunteer studies of norovirus infection where exact time of exposure is known,9,10 as well as the median incubation period length of 32.5 hours observed in this outbreak. Assuming the onset date and time of Chef A’s illness was accurately reported, this indicates Chef A was likely exposed to the virus 1-2 days prior to the banquet (not at the same time as banquet attendees and other staff). Although Chef A’s symptoms did not begin until after the banquet was over, shedding of norovirus in the stool of infected asymptomatic individuals has been documented11 and it was likely Chef A was shedding virus at the time he/she was preparing and plating the food for the banquet. Additionally, carriage and shedding of norovirus has been documented in individuals who never develop symptoms.12 It is also possible that an unidentified asymptomatic shedding employee could have served as a source of contamination during food prep, or that an ill employee did not accurately disclose his/her illness status and onset date/time.

While Front of House staff were involved in adding croutons to salads, none of these items were statistically associated with illness. Only items that were prepared and finished in the kitchen were statistically associated with illness, increasing the likelihood the contamination event occurred during banquet meal preparation. If a banquet server was the source, we would expect to see no statistically significant association with a specific food item because all types of entrée plates would be handled by the ill individual.

Results of the case-control study showed that individuals who consumed the New York strip steak (served with a red wine reduction), buttery garlic chive mashed potatoes, and glazed carrots were more than two times more likely to become ill than those who did not. These three items were plated together on the same plate. A significant statistical association with illness existed for each item individually and for all three items combined. No other food or beverage items were statistically associated with illness. The fact that all food items with a significant association with illness were cooked items (except the chopped parsley garnish and honey glaze) suggests that contamination occurred after the items were cooked. Foodborne norovirus outbreaks commonly involve food items that are handled and served raw, such as salads and fruit. The only raw ingredients on the steak plates reported by the establishment were chopped fresh parsley used as garnish and the honey squeezed onto the carrots after reheating. Since the chef stated that the same parsley was used as garnish for all three entrees, if the parsley was contaminated at its source (in the field), we would expect to see no statistically significant food item, since all entrees would have contained the same parsley. However, the fact that only the steak plate was statistically associated with illness suggests contamination by food worker during kitchen prep is more likely than contamination in the field. Contamination could have been introduced if parsley was chopped while wearing gloves, but then added to the steak plates by an ungloved hand. Alternatively, the parsley may have only been added to the steak plates. Also, contamination could have also been introduced if the honey squeeze bottle or bottle nozzle was contaminated with norovirus.

Although no additional illnesses were reported among attendees of subsequent banquets, one secondary case occurred in an employee, suggesting person-to-person transmission or transmission from contact with contaminated environmental surfaces also occurred among staff the day after the banquet. Chef A continued to work the next couple days while symptomatic with diarrhea and could have contaminated surfaces or transferred the virus via contact, serving as the source of infection for the secondary case identified among staff. Hotel employees with primary cases who became ill but did not consume banquet food may have been exposed to contaminated food during serving, table clearing, or cleaning, or to contaminated surfaces such as tables in kitchen prep areas, sinks, bathrooms, or door handles.

Several contributing factors were identified during this outbreak investigation, and multiple violations of Wisconsin Food Code which could contribute to the likelihood of an outbreak occurring were observed during the on-site assessments conducted by WCHD sanitarians. Bare-handed contact of ready-to-eat food items by food workers was observed multiple times during the same visit, suggesting that bare- handed contact occurs frequently during routine food prep activities at the facility. The facility did not have any formal written employee illness, hand washing, or glove use policies. Review of the employees’ work schedules in conjunction with their illness onset and resolution dates indicated that Chef A worked preparing food for more banquets at the facility while symptomatic with diarrhea, which violates Wisconsin Food Code. Additionally, hotel employee restrooms did not have functioning fans and are located near (approx. 15ft) food preparation areas. While the case-control study results point to contamination of specific food items as the source of illness during this outbreak, the close proximity of the employee bathrooms to prep areas could contribute to kitchen contamination and future outbreaks.

RECOMMENDATIONS

According to the CDC, while there is no vaccine to prevent norovirus infection, illness can be prevented through proper hand hygiene; washing fruits and vegetables and cooking seafood thoroughly before consuming; avoiding food preparation and caring for others when sick; cleansing and disinfecting contaminated surfaces; and carefully washing laundry.

Individuals who work in the food service industry should be aware of practices that can prevent the spread of noroviruses:

  • not preparing food for others when sick and for at least 48 hours after symptoms stop,
  • practicing proper hand hygiene,
  • rinsing fruits and vegetables and cooking shellfish,
  • regularly cleaning and sanitizing kitchen utensils, counters, and surfaces, and
  • carefully washing table linens, napkins, and other laundry.

It is particularly important for food establishment employees to inform their manager when they are ill and to not work while sick with gastroenteritis and for at least 48 hours following recovery. Complying with this recommendation means that employees need to be both aware of it and have the motivation and responsibility to comply with it.

The following recommendations were developed for Hotel Marshfield following the assessment conducted on 4/20 and 4/21/2016:

  • Review internal procedures regarding employee illness, glove use, and hand washing to ensure they are consistent with standard food safety regulations, and create written policies outlining these procedures.
  • Review and update sick leave policy for management and employees.
  • All personnel, including management, should undergo comprehensive food handling training that includes at a minimum: personal hygiene, proper use of disposable gloves, and employee illness policies to ensure complete understanding.

Consider installing negative pressure ceiling fans in employee restrooms to minimize movement of aerosolized particles into the kitchen, or, discontinue use of the employee restrooms in the kitchen area.

As a result of these recommendations, the hotel has reviewed their procedures for reporting illness, glove use, and hand washing with all staff. The sick leave policy has been reviewed with all staff, and the fact that all staff that earn paid time off (sick leave) has been reinforced. The WCHD conducted an onsite food safety training at Hotel Marshfield that discussed personal hygiene, glove use, and employee illness, as well as other risk factors for foodborne illness. The information provided during the training presentation and via brochures has been incorporated into the hotel’s employee training program.

The employee restroom fans were verified operational (low-flow, constant-on fans) and the employee restroom doors have had spring hinges installed to self-close and keep closed. Ready-to-use spray bottles of bleach solution have been added as an additional option for sanitizing in the kitchen.

Norovirus Outbreak Associated with a Banquet at Hotel Marshfield

4.nov.16

Wood County Health Department ,  Wisconsin Division of Public Health Bureau of Communicable Diseases

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3190897/Final-Investigation-Report-Wood-Hotel-Marshfield.pdf

California mother faces jail time after trying to sell homemade food on Facebook

KTLA 5 reports that a Stockton woman faces an impending trial and potential jail time after she joined a social media community food group, and sold some of the meals she cooked, which county San Joaquin County officials say is against the law.

cevicheMariza Reulas was cited by San Joaquin County for selling an illegal substance, but it wasn’t a powder, a pill or a plant. It was her bowl of homemade ceviche, according to KTXL.

“It was just like unreal that they were saying you could face up to a year in jail,” said Reulas.

A few years ago Reulas joined a Facebook group called 209 Food Spot – a forum she says, where people from the Stockton area shared recipes, organized potlucks and occasionally sold what they cooked.

“Somebody would be like, ‘Oh I don’t have anything to trade you but I would love to buy a plate,’ like they’d be off of work,” Reulas said.

On December 3 of last year, someone contacted Reulas, asking for a plate of her Ceviche –- one of her signature dishes. That person was an undercover investigator from San Joaquin County, according to court documents, on a sting because the majority of 209 Food Spot members didn’t have permits to sell their food.

Reulas and a dozen others were cited for two misdemeanors for operating a food facility and engaging in business without a permit.

Reulas refused to plea down to three years of probation. Now the single mother of six is headed to trial and could end up in jail.

“I don’t write the laws, I enforce them. And the legislature has felt that this is a crime,” said San Joaquin County Deputy District Attorney Kelly McDaniel. She says selling any food not subject to health department inspection puts whoever eats it in real danger, not to mention it undercuts business owners who do get permits to make their food.

She says the 209 Food Spot Facebook group was sent a warning before charges were handed down.

Ceviche ain’t muffins and cookies. It’s raw fish alleged cleaned up with some acid from lemons and limes.

 

Brag about a good restaurant inspection store, diners more positive

It’s a stretch to say that posting restaurant inspection results – letter grades, color cards, numbers, smiley faces – affects much of anything because of the limitations involved in studying the question.

larry-david-rest-inspecDo letter grades reduce foodborne illness?

Probably not.

Do they make food safer?

Probably not.

Do managers pay attention and go crazy on staff when they get a lousy score?

Probably

Do consumers pay attention?

Probably.

Given these exceedingly scientific answers, what I’ve observed over the past 15 years is that the biggest benefit of public disclosure is its role in the overall rise of food-safety-kind-that-makes-people-barf awareness.

Here’s another group having having-a-go at the role of inspections and disclosure.

Ensuring the safety of food served in restaurants continues to be an essential issue in the hospitality industry. An important part of the efforts to stem the outbreak of foodborne illnesses are the mandatory inspections of any entity that serves food to the public.

rest-inspection-color-sacramentoUnfortunately, while posting food safety scores is intended to help consumers make better dining choices, interpreting these scores can often be difficult and confusing. The purpose of this study is to use information processing theory as a framework to investigate how consumers evaluate food safety inspection scores. To achieve this goal, this research provides an account of the effect of food safety concern on consumers’ attitudes toward restaurants under conditions of both positive and negative health inspection results.

The results identify a moderating effect of health score in the formation of consumers’ attitudes toward restaurants. The downstream effects on expected satisfaction and behaviors are also established.

Understanding responses to posted restaurant food safety scores: An information processing and regulatory focus perspective

International Journal of Hospitality Management, Volume 60, January 2017, Pages 67–76

Kimberly J. Harris, Ed. D., Lydia Hanks, Ph. D., Nathaniel D. Line, Ph. D. and Sean McGinley, Ph. D.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278431916302006

Barf’s up: South Bank Surf Club faces 32 charges after 28 sickened with raw egg aioli

On Sept. 23, 2015, Brisbane’s South Bank Surf Club allegedly made up a large batch of raw-egg-based aioli sauce and served it for seven days.

garlic_aioliAt least 28 diners were sickened.

At the time, the manager of the club said the cause was “a bad batch of eggs’’ provided by a supplier. They said the eggs had been used in sauces served with seafood platters.

“We’ve been caught out, unfortunately. Our customers’ wellbeing is our priority and anyone with concerns can get in touch with us,” they said. “To rectify the problem, we are not making sauces in-house.’’

This is a common refrain in Australia.

We, the chefs, would never put the health of our customers in harm’s way, yet they continue to do so with the line, we got a bad batch of eggs.

south-bank-surf-club-1_lrgNow, Brisbane City Council health inspectors have filed a complaint in Brisbane Magistrates Court accusing the club, owned by Brisbane hospitality king Bevan Bickle, of letting the aioli and other sauces sit kitchen benches for up to three hours without refrigeration on the day they were used in meals including fish and chips, burgers and pulled pork sandwiches between September 23 and October 1 last year.

Court documents state aioli is a “potentially hazardous food” because “pathogenic microorganisms” can grow due to the raw egg and it needs to be refrigerated.

The club faces 32 charges of breaching food safety laws.

When inspector Heath Vogler visited the restaurant on October 16 he alleges the aioli was kept at 11C.

The council summons filed in court states aioli must be stored below 5C to minimise the growth of poisonous bacteria.

The case returns to court on December 23. The restaurant has not entered a plea.

A table of Australian egg outbreaks is available at https://barfblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/raw-egg-related-outbreaks-australia-10-9-15.xlsx

35K fine in UK: ‘Incapable of running a business involving food’

At St Albans Crown Court yesterday, judge Andrew Bright described hygiene standards at the Khyber Balti House in Market Place as “lamentable”, and 41-year-old Mohammed Kemal Hussain as “incapable of running a business involved in serving food”.

khyber-balti-houseHussain, of Dragon Way, Hatfield, was fined £23,000 for 23 food safety offences, and ordered to pay costs of £12,366 to the borough council.