How do you know that hamburger is done?

The family along with a friend went to Palm Beach on Friday.

hamburger.done.jan.14Not that Palm Beach, but the one on the Gold Coast (Australia) about an hour away.

After acting like tourists and getting sunburnt, we grabbed some lunch. I usually order what the kid wants, and eat the leftovers, a strategy I learned from having four previous kids.

She wanted a hamburger (right, exactly as shown) so I asked the purveyor at the takeaway, how do you know the hamburger is done?

She said people complain if it’s pink, so they cook it well.

Color is a lousy indicator. Stick it in.

barfblog.Stick It In

Hamburgers at Christmas in Australia

Christmas can be exhausting in Australia. There’s no Thanksgiving, little Halloween, and summer’s here, so everyone’s ready to party.

Match that with two Christmas concerts from different childcare outfits, and the birthday party tomorrow at the park, and I’m not sure how Amy is keeping ihamburger.pool.dec.13t together.

Tonight, to relieve some pressure, we ate at the pool after the swimming lessons, because every Aussie child must swim (and play hockey – the ice kind – but that’s my addition).

I got a burger and fries for me and Amy, and chicken thingies with fries for the kid.

No aioli or mayonnaise.

But I did ask the person who took two frozen patties and fried them up, how do you know when the hamburger is done.

She said she cuts the patty in half and looks at the color.

Uh-huh.

Color is a lousy indicator of safety, and my burger was not cut – not that it would matter.

Use a tip-sensitive digital thermometer and stick it in. That’s what I’ll be doing at the kid’s birthday party at the barbie in the park tomorrow.

barfblog.Stick It In

 

Get rid of piping hot advice? UK research call on effectiveness of surface treatment in reducing microbiological contamination

The UK Food Standards Agency says the undercooking of meat products, such as burgers and sausages, continues to be a significant concern, particularly for enforcement officers responsible for assessing the safety of practices used by food businesses. 

Meat products, such as burgers, have been associated with food poisoning and they can pose a risk of illness because of the way they are prepared if they are then ben-newundercooked. For example, with whole pieces of meat, bacterial contamination is usually present on the outer surfaces. Internal (deep muscle) contamination is unlikely unless the meat has been pierced. External contamination can become spread throughout the meat during mincing, such as in the preparation of burgers, kebabs, sausages and other products.

There are indications that consumers and caterers are showing a preference for serving burgers undercooked and in a variety of settings. Local authority enforcement officers are concerned about the risk posed by such practices. A number of bacterial hazards may be associated with meat of which verocytotoxin-producing E.coli and salmonella are considered to be the most important.

The aim of the project is to examine whether treating the external surfaces of different cuts of beef, lamb and venison with heat and/or organic acids is effective in reducing microbiological contamination. This would be both before and after these meats are made into comminuted (a process that breaks up the meat into smaller pieces) products such as burgers.

The work should include:

• a range of meat cuts from beef, lamb and venison, focusing on those cuts that would typically be used for the production of burgers;

• examining naturally contaminated meat, as well as samples spiked with pathogens, and include a range of heat and/or organic acid treatments; and,

• assessments both before and after the preparation of the meat into a range of comminuted products such as burgers, steak tartar, kebabs and sausages which may be served raw or lightly cooked.

6 sick: federal health types publicly absent in Canadian E. coli burger outbreak

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency announced late Wednesday night that certain Compliments brand Super 8 Beef Burgers were being recalled because they may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.

They said people were sick but wouldn’t say how many; that’s up to either the e.coli.O157.belmont.oct.13Public Health Agency of Canada or Health Canada (who knows the difference).

The silence has been deafening.

However, a spokesman for Ontario’s health ministry told the Weyburn Review there have been six confirmed cases of illness in that province associated with the beef in question. Of the six people, four were hospitalized; of the four, one is still in hospital. All are recovering, the ministry said.

Use thermometers says health reporter nearly killed by food poisoning

Serena Gordon of HealthDay says food thermometers are now standard in her home after a brush with shiga-toxin producing E. coli nearly killed her. Story below:

As a health reporter, I’d heard plenty of stories about food contamination and had taken steps to make sure my family’s food was as safe as it could be. If I saw friends eating undercooked ground beef, I’d gently chide them about the possible dangers of barfblog.Stick It Ineating food that wasn’t prepared properly. Friends dubbed me the “food police.”

Contracting a foodborne illness was not something you’d expect would happen to me.

Nonetheless, three days after a barbecue with friends at my house, I woke up feeling sicker than I’d ever felt.

I had terrible heartburn and abdominal pain. I had cold sweats and a strange pain in my left arm, along with a feeling that something was terribly wrong. Then, the diarrhea started. Within an hour, I’d had more than 10 bowel movements. I couldn’t shake an incredible feeling of dread.

Then I began vomiting, forcefully and repeatedly. I felt myself quickly becoming disoriented. I managed to make it back to bed and, before I passed out, mumbled “9-1-1” to my husband.

At the hospital, blood tests showed that my kidneys and liver had shut down, and I was immediately admitted to the intensive care unit.

I knew I was dying. No one said so, but I could feel it. Later, my doctor told me that I had only a 15 percent chance of surviving that first night.

The diagnosis: two disorders caused by an infection with E. coli — hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. In addition to kidney and liver failure, my red blood cells were now forming small clots and blocking small blood vessels. This caused bruises to form all over my body. My entire right arm was black and blue, as was half of my left arm, from where they tried to take blood from me.

The pain was excruciating. And, because my kidneys weren’t working, I was swollen almost beyond recognition. When they weighed me in the ICU, I had gained more than 20 pounds in fluid in three days. My fingers, which were so filled with fluid that they couldn’t bend, felt like they might just pop like a balloon.

My treatment included kidney dialysis and plasmapheresis, a procedure that removes blood from your body and separates the plasma from the blood. Then the rest of the blood is mixed with donated plasma and returned to the body. Though normally a cream color, the plasma removed from my body was black, apparently because of all the dead red blood cells. For almost two weeks, I spent four to eight hours a day hooked up to blood-sucking machines. I also received blood transfusions.

Eventually, though, the treatments worked. My blood cells started behaving normally, and my kidneys started functioning again. After nine days in the ICU and another 10 days in the hospital, I went home.

Recovery was a long and slow process. It took several months before most of my blood work came back normal. I saw countless doctors for lingering problems, which included a painful, reactive arthritis (a type of arthritis that can develop after a bad infection) and nerve damage from where the dialysis shunt had been placed. The arthritis persisted for about a year, but I did not need long-term kidney dialysis, and my health in time returned to normal — though no one can say definitively that I won’t have trouble down the road. I was grateful to have survived.

So how did all this happen to someone who’d been so careful to make sure that burgers were always well-cooked, with no pink meat. A doctor who specializes in infectious diseases explained that, even though the meat was gray and looked cooked, there must have been an area of the meat that hadn’t reached a high enough temperature to kill the bacteria.

At the time, food safety experts weren’t stressing the need to take the temperature of food to ensure that it’s cooked well. That’s changed. So have my precautions.

Perhaps not surprisingly, I now own several well-used food thermometers. And hamburgers at my house are now always cooked to 160 degrees at the thickest part of the meat.

hamburger-safe and unsafe-thumb-450x138-175

How to make perfectly dangerous burger patties

The Food Network, home of dysfunctional food safety procedures – but at least they don’t claim they’re science-based – has a number of tips for hamburger patties that profiles food porn over safety:

• for square sliders, “cook the patties until a crust forms, about 2 minutes per BMA98tjCMAEfqwFside, topping with cheese after flipping, if desired;”

• for cheese stuffed burgers, “preheat a grill to medium high and oil the grates and season the patties with salt and pepper and grill 5 to 6 minutes per side;

• for thin burgers, cook the patties in a skillet until a crust forms, 2 to 3 minutes per side; continue cooking until browned, 1 more minute per side, topping with cheese during the last minute, if desired; and,

• for half-pound bistro burgers, divide 2 pounds ground beef chuck into 4 pieces and grill burgers, covered, about 6 minutes per side.

Use a thermometer and stick it in. Will account for all the variations in cooking devices, and make you a better cook.

And you may not make anyone sick.

celebrity.chefs

Stick it in with a thermometer, not a finger (yours or anyone else’s)

Canada’s version of state-sponsored jazz, CBC Radio, is the latest entrant in the terrible food safety advice category.

After several minutes of seductive food porn talk about the perfect burger, food and nutritionist columnist Julie Van Rosendaal said on CBC Calgary morning rare.hamburgerradio show, The Eyeopener, on April 30, 2012, I don’t know anyone who checks burgers with a thermometer.

One of the hosts had opined that people are told to get their burgers well-done, yet this one looks medium rare.

Van Rosendaal derisively pooh-poohed the question, saying something about the temperature should be 160F, adding that, “I don’t know many people who stick a meat thermometer in their burger,” and that cooks can tell when it’s done when it springs back when you touch the patty, rather than a finger sliding into the patty.

The clip is 7:48 long, and they start talking about this at 5:30. It’s available at http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=2382534459.

Color is a lousy indicator of hamburger safety. So is finger-banging beef. Use a tip-sensitive digital thermometer and stick it in. The refs are all here.

bites_stick_it_in(40)

People sick but how many remains a Canadian mystery; E. coli O157 in burgers

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and Canada Safeway Limited are warning the public not to consume The Gourmet Meat Shoppe and The Butcher’s Cut brands of Frozen Beef Burgers described below because these products may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 bacteria.

This recall is the result of E. coli O157:H7 product testing by the CFIA related to an ongoing outbreak investigation. The CFIA is currently conducting a food safety investigation at the producing facility to determine if any additional products may be affected.e.coli.burger.2.13d

e.coli.burger.feb.13

More E. coli O157 illnesses and recalls in Canada

CFIA ain’t so good at this food safety thing.

Earlier this month, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and Loblaw Companies Ltd. warned the public not to consume certain Butcher’s Choice Garlic Peppercorn Beef Burgers because this product may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.

By Saturday, five people were confirmed sick in this outbreak.

In Sept. 2012, at least 17 Canadians were sickened with E. coli O157:H7 linked to beef slaughtered at the XL Foods plant in Alberta.

Now, CFIA and Cardinal Meat Specialists Ltd. are warning the public not to consume Prime Rib Beef Burgers because this product may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 bacteria.

CFIA says, “This investigation was initiated as a result of recent product testing associated with an outbreak investigation. There may be recalls of additional products as the investigation at this facility continues.”

Are more people sick? Are these outbreaks and recalls related? Does genetic fingerprinting exist in Canada or are chromosomes still being quantified under a microscope after jumping on a telephone book on a slide containing some cells (we actually did that in early 1980s genetics).

The Calgary Herald reports this morning CFIA officials were first alerted to a potential problem with hamburgers from a Brampton, Ont. plant in early October after an Edmonton patient became ill from E. coli O157:H7 poisoning.

But nearly two months passed and four more cases emerged before the federal agency began an investigation in early December.

At that point, CFIA decided it needed to confirm that contaminated product had actually found its way into the market, so it ordered inspectors to visit more than 300 stores across Canada to collect samples.

When two samples tested positive a week later on Dec. 12, agency officials issued a health alert, and Cardinal Meat Specialists Limited began a voluntary recall.

CFIA officials did not reply Sunday to written questions from the Herald about the apparent delay in launching a recall, although a spokesman has said the agency was unable to act until it had conclusive proof there was tainted product on store shelves.

Why? Doesn’t epidemiology matter?

Where is this policy enshrined? On what basis does CFIA go public?

Brent Cator, president of Cardinal Meat Specialists, told the Herald his company makes frozen patties using beef trim from various Canadian and international processors that has been certified as free from E. coli O157:H7. However, he refused to identify the sources of the meat used in the recalled burgers.

Still no beef fix a year after salmonella outbreak

One year after a recall of contaminated ground meat sold at Hannaford stores exposed blind spots in the nation’s food-safety chain, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has yet to move forward with a proposed rule to improve record-keeping and, in turn, better protect public health.

According to the Maine Sunday Telegram when a salmonella outbreak that sickened 20 people was traced to the supermarket chain in late 2011, Hannaford voluntarily improved its tracking procedures so it could better identify the point of origin of its beef and therefore the origin of any contamination.

But while the USDA said it expected to send a detailed proposal of its new rule requiring other grocers to do the same to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review last summer, that still hasn’t happened.

And no one from the USDA will say what has held up the process, or when the rule might move forward.

“I have to say, I’m extremely disappointed that the regulations haven’t been put into place yet,” said U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree, a Maine Democrat representing the 1st District. She has served on the House Agriculture Committee for the past two years and hopes to continue.

After the recall, the Maine Sunday Telegram/Portland Press Herald investigated the problem and exposed the holes in the USDA’s system in a special report published in March.

Meanwhile, several people sickened in the salmonella outbreak are still seeking compensation from Hannaford.

“I just want the bills paid and the things to go away,” said Kenneth Koehler, 53, of Old Orchard Beach, who has racked up $8,000 in medical expenses since he was sickened more than a year ago.

He hasn’t eaten a hamburger since.

No one from the USDA, which was also tight-lipped during the recall investigation, would say when it might send the proposal to the White House.