Going public: FDA inspection of cantaloupe farm reveals failures

On Aug. 17, 2012, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced an outbreak of Salmonella linked to cantaloupe.

On Aug. 22, 2012, announced Chamberlain Farms in Owensville, Indiana was voluntarily recalling its cantaloupes.

But beginning Aug. 14, 2012, FDA types visited the farm as the epidemiological investigation increasingly fingered Chamberlain cantaloupes in an outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Newport which has killed three people and sickened 270 in 26 states.

That report has now been made public by Bill Marler and again raises the question: when does sufficient evidence exist to issue a public warning about a potential health risk?

The other questions are becoming embarrassingly repetitive, like the E. coli outbreak in Canada going on right now. With the cantaloupe, how is it a 500 acre cantaloupe farm could operate with such safety violations after all the attention shone on the sector after last year’s listeria-in-cantaloupe outbreak that killed at least 33 people? How could the auditors for any of the firms that bought the cantaloupes not have raised any red flags? Why is Chamberlain Farms being silent?

1.During the inspection I observed, indications of poor sanitary practices demonstrating contamination in the firm’s cantaloupe packing shed through environmental swabs and product samples which tested positive for Salmonella as follows:

• During this inspection on 08/16/2012, cantaloupes were collected from the 21-acre field located at Old 65 and Co Rd 525 W and tested positive for Salmonella Newport and Salmonella Typhimurium.

• During this inspection on 08/16/2012, cantaloupes were also collected from a cardboard bin after processing in the packing shed and tested positive for Salmonella Newport.

• During the inspection 08114/2012, environmental swabs were collected from various locations and surfaces throughout the packing shed. 7 of 50 environmental swabs tested positive for Salmonella Newport. 2 of 50 environmental swabs tested positive for Salmonella Anatum.

2. Food contact surfaces are not constructed/designed in a manner to allow for appropriate cleaning: 
On 08/14/2012, while cantaloupes were being processed, I observed, porous food contact surfaces including carpet and wood used throughout the cantaloupe processing line which does not allow for adequate cleaning. Apparent rust and corrosion on multiple pieces of equipment throughout the processing line was also observed.

3. Failure to clean as frequently as necessary to protect against contamination of food: 
 On 08/14/2012, while cantaloupes were being processed, I observed, multiple locations of the conveyor including rollers and belts, had an accumulation of black, green, and brown buildup. There was an accumulation of debris including trash, wood, food pieces, standing water, mud, dirt, and green buildup observed beneath the conveyer belt in the cantaloupe packing shed.

4. On 08/14/2012, while cantaloupes were being processed, I observed, standing water in the packing shed on the floor directly below the first conveyer belts of the packing line and on the drip table, which is below the bristle conveyer belt where cantaloupes are being washed and rinsed. This water appeared to have algae growing in it.

5. The processing water line is not constructed in such a manner as to prevent food contamination: 
 On 08/ 14/2012, while cantaloupes were being processed, I observed the pipe used to supply well water into the dump tank and spray nozzles over the conveyer belt were leaking and appeared to have an accumulation of rust. This water comes into direct contact with the cantaloupe as they are traveling along the processing line.

6. The firm was not monitoring the effective levels of the chlorine sanitizer in the water contained in the concrete dump tank of the cantaloupe processing line, nor could firm management provide monitoring records to that effect.

7. Failure to remove litter and waste that may constitute an attractant, breeding place, or harborage area for pests, within the immediate vicinity of the plant buildings or structures: 
 On 08/14/2012, the firm’s garbage receptacle (located on the outside west wall of the packing shed approximately 15 from the processing line) was overflowing with garbage. The north and south sides of the processing shed do not have a wall and is exposed directly to the outside environment.

This entry was posted in Food Safety Policy and tagged , , , by Douglas Powell. Bookmark the permalink.

About Douglas Powell

A former professor of food safety and the publisher of barfblog.com, Powell is passionate about food, has five daughters, and is an OK goaltender in pickup hockey. Download Doug’s CV here. Dr. Douglas Powell editor, barfblog.com retired professor, food safety 3/289 Annerley Rd Annerley, Queensland 4103 dpowell29@gmail.com 61478222221 I am based in Brisbane, Australia, 15 hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time