Tiffany Eversley, guest barfblogger: Dry lips? Try some Chicken Poop

While skimming through the pages of People magazine, discovering the latest in style and fashion, I came across chicken poop lip chap.

The label reads “100% free range chicken poop lip junk “ however despite the name, there is no fecal matter listed in the ingredients. In fact, the natural ingredients include all natural 100% pure non-GMO soy, jojoba, sweet orange, lavender, and bees wax.

I was relieved to find out that consumers weren’t actually putting shit on their lips. Chicken feces are often a vector of salmonella- a serious bacteria that can cause sever diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps.

Chicken poop lip junk originated when its creator, Jamie Faith Tabor Schmidt, heard her grandfather say, "I know how to fix those chapped lips, I’ll rub some chicken poop on `em so you won’t be lickin` ’em."

Along with the ambiguous Chicken poop lip chap, The Simone Chickenbone™ Natural Put-Ons™ line also includes  “Good gravy”, a moisturizing hair pomade, and “Kill It Dead”, a natural vegan spray deodorant- great stocking stuffers for the 2007 holiday season.

Tiffany Eversley is an fourth year food science student at the University of Guelph

Mouthwatering burger

Jeffrey Steingarten and Vogue magazine is offering up tips to make the perfect tasting burger. Some of the advice sounds helpful, but I question if all of it is safe.
Here are a few excerpts:

“Grind or Else: Steingarten concludes you must either grind your own meat or have a trusted butcher grind it for you, for reasons of taste and safety (or, perish the thought, be sentenced to a life of consuming well-done burgers).”

While fresh ground beef may have taste benefits, I am not too sure what beef straight from the butcher has to do with safety. In fact, a local butcher in Wales was recently jailed for selling beef contaminated with E. coli. Local does not equate to safe; food can only be as safe as the people that handle and produce it.

“He explains in painstaking detail all of the ways supermarket ground beef can be contaminated. His solution, if you have any questions about the chopped meat you’ve just bought: "Drop the meat into a pot of boiling water for a minute, fish it out, and pat it dry….”

Again, I am not sure how this makes your meat safer. If you drop a clump of ground beef into boiling water, it may kill of any microorganisms on the surface, but no such luck for anything lurking inside. Meat is not done when temperatures around the meat are above 160 degrees Fahrenheit; it is done when the meat itself is 160 degrees.

“…if you flip a burger or a steak every fifteen to 30 seconds, the outside surface will get nicely browned while the inside stays relatively cool.”

It is a good idea to frequently flip to avoid a crispy burger, but what is the purpose of keeping the inside ‘relatively cool’? Studies have shown ground beef is fully cooked only when the center of the patty is 160 degrees Fahrenheit. Keeping the inside ‘relatively cool’ (assuming Mr. Steingarten means less than 160) is only increasing the risk of food borne illness. In fact, temperature is not mentioned anywhere in the article.

Here is my recipe for a perfect tasting burger:
1.    Mix in some Chipotle Tabasco sauce with the meat.
2.    Use a sprinkle of seasoning salt right before cooking the burger.
3.    Flip the burger regularly.
4.    Top with Pepper Jack cheese.
5.    Cook burgers to 160 degrees, and use a tip sensitive meat thermometer.

Once step five is complete, then you have a mouthwatering burger.

Bill Marler, guest barfblogger: Suing the church over E. coli O157?

When Nebraska Beef first raised the issue that it intended to sue the church for “mishandling” its E. coli O157:H7 contaminated meat I laughed.  I then calmly tried to respond that the Meat Industry that makes a profit off of selling “USDA Inspected Meat” couldn’t blame the consumer if the product actually contains a pathogen that can severely sicken or kill a bunch of nice older ladies at a church supper.  What other product in the United States would a manufacturer expect consumers to fix themselves before they used it?
 
My calmness faded. Think about the little labels on meat that you buy in the store – the ones that tell you to cook the meat to 160 degrees – of course they also say USDA inspected too. However, the labels do not say:

“The USDA inspection means nothing.  This product may contain pathogenic bacteria that can severely sicken or kill you and/or your child.  Handle this product with extreme care.”

I wonder why the Meat Industry does not want a label like that on your pound of hamburger? It knows that the label is truthful. Do you think it might be concerned that Moms and Dads would stop buying it? The day the industry puts a similar label on hamburger is the day that I will go work for them.
 
The reality is that the Meat Industry cannot assure the public that the meat we buy is not contaminated. So, instead of finding a way to get cattle feces out of our meat, they blame grandparents (and presumably all the teenagers that work at all the burger joints in America) when children get sick.
 
Consumers can always do better. However, study after study shows that, despite the CDC estimated 76 million people getting sick every year from food borne illnesses, the American public still has misconceptions and overconfidence in our Nation’s food supply.
 
According to a study by the Partnership for Food Safety Education, fewer than half of the respondents knew that fresh vegetables and fruits could contain harmful bacteria, and only 25% thought that eggs and dairy products could be contaminated. Most consumers believe that food safety hazards can be seen or smelled. Only 25% of consumers surveyed knew that cooking temperatures were critical to food safety, and even fewer knew that foods should be refrigerated promptly after cooking. Consumers do not expect that things that you cannot see in your food can kill you.

Consumers are being blamed, but most lack the knowledge or tools to properly protect themselves and their children. The FDA has stated, “unlike other pathogens, E. coli O157:H7 has no margin for error. It takes only a microscopic amount to cause serious illness or even death.” Over the last few years our Government and the Meat Industry have repeatedly told the consumer to cook hamburger until there is no pink. Yet, recent university and USDA studies show meat can turn brown before it is actually “done.” Now the consumer is urged to use a thermometer to test the internal temperature of the meat. However, how do you use one, and who really has one?

Many consumers wrongly believe the Government is protecting the food supply. How many times have we heard our Government officials spout “The US food supply is the safest in the world.”

Where is the multi-million dollar ad campaign to convince us of the dangers of hamburger, like we do for tobacco? The USDA’s FightBAC and Thermy education programs are limited, and there are no studies to suggest that they are effective. Most consumers learn about food safety from TV and family members – If your TV viewing habits and family are like mine, these are highly suspect sources of good information.

The bottom line is that you cannot leave the last bacteria “Kill Step” to a grandparent or to a kid in a fast food joint. The industry that makes billions off of selling meat must step up and clean up their mess. They can, and someday will, if I have anything to say about it. That day will come much faster if they start working on it now, and stop blaming the victims.

William D. Marler of Marler Clark LLP PS, (www.marlerclark.com) is a trial lawyer who represents victims of food-borne illnesses, and the father of three daughters.  Bill comments on food safety at www.marlerblog.com and can be reached at 1-206-719-4705.

Suzanne Schreck, guest barfblogger: Wine protects against nasty bugs

My favorite meal includes a New York strip steak, asparagus, mashed potatoes, salad, and a glass of cabernet. 

In recent months, media reports on new research being conducted at the University of Missouri-Columbia have indicated that that glass of cabernet may effectively kill bacterial pathogens that have found their way into my meal, making it safer.  Just this weekend WTAE TV in Pittsburgh reported on the results of this research: 

The neat thing about the study is that it doesn’t seem to matter about the price. It’s all in the color of the wine: red.

Researchers said cabernet, pinot noir and merlot have the right stuff to protect against Salmonella typhimurium, H.pylori and the potentially fatal Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli.

After reading this report, one might conclude that eating raw cookie dough is OK as long as it’s followed by a glass of red wine.  But what do the researchers really have to say? 

Azlin Mustapha and Atreyee Das were interviewed by Abraham Mahshie for an article in the Columbia Tribune.  In the interview, Das said, “Sixty percent [concentration] wine is enough to kill bacteria,” but that concentration was reached in a controlled environment in a test tube in a lab – not in the human gut, which is where consumers might seek practical application of this new knowledge.

Lead researcher Mustapha told the Tribune, “I would not recommend that people go out and consume wine in excess.”  But how does this research really apply to the average person’s wine consumption?  Early reporting on the findings may give us false hope that one, two, even three glasses of red wine with dinner might make eating a rare hamburger safe.

Mustapha and Das anticipate two to three years of additional research on the subject.  When their study is published, maybe they’ll be able to tell me how much cabernet I have to drink to kill the pathogens on my steak, asparagus, and mashed potatoes.  Until then, I’ll rely on the system, from farm to fork, to keep the pathogens off my plate to begin with.

Suzanne Schreck is the communications director of Marler Clark.  Since joining Marler Clark in 2002, Ms. Schreck has managed the firm’s media relations and on-line presence, including the firm’s websites and blogs.

Bill Marler, guest barfblogger: Calling for Congressional hearings on the safety of the US meat supply

Earlier this year J. Patrick Boyle, President and Chief Executive of the American Meat Institute, wrote in part in the New York Times:  “Since 1999, the incidence of E. coli in ground beef samples tested by the Agriculture Department has declined by 80 percent to a fraction of a percent, a level once thought impossible.” At the time I agreed with Mr. Boyle. In fact, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, E. coli outbreaks linked to tainted meat declined by 42 percent.  But something has changed, and it has not changed for the better. 

Here are the facts.  A decade ago most of my clients were sickened by E. coli-tainted meat. In fact, between 1993 and 2002 I recovered over $250 Million from the meat industry and restaurants in verdicts and settlements on behalf of those clients, mostly children with kidney failure caused from consuming E. coli-tainted hamburger.  And, then it stopped.  From 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 and through the spring of 2007 there were few recalls or illnesses tied to hamburger.  I did not sue the meat industry often and I touted it, as a model of what an industry could do that was right to protect consumers.

But then it changed this spring.  Since April of this year, nearly 30,000,000 pounds of red meat, mostly hamburger, has been recalled.  E. coli illnesses once on a downturn have spiked.  Kids are getting sick; seriously sick again.  For example, at 2:00 this morning, Topps Meat Company expanded its 300,000-pound recall to include 21,700,000 pounds of ground beef; as of this morning 25 people are sickened in eight states.  This recall tops the Con Agra recall of 19,000,000 pounds in 2002 that sickened over forty and killed one and is just under the 25,000,000 pounds recalled by now-bankrupt Hudson Foods in 1997.  And, this is not the first time Topps was caught selling E. coli contaminated meat.

Other outbreaks and recalls in the last few months include:  (1) six people in Washington, two people in Oregon and one in Idaho who became sick from E. coli-tainted organic beef ground by Interstate Meat.  42,000 pounds of meat was recalled.  (2) Thirteen people have been confirmed ill with E. coli infections after eating ground beef produced by United Food Group sold in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming and Montana. Over 5,700,000 pound of meat have been recalled.  (3) Tyson Fresh Meats recalled 40,440 pounds of ground beef products due to possible contamination with E. coli.  (4) Seven Minnesotans were confirmed as part of the E. coli outbreak that prompted PM Beef Holdings to recall 117,500 pounds of beef trim products that was ground and sold at Lunds and Byerly’s stores.  (5) Twenty-seven people have been confirmed ill with E. coli infections in Fresno County. The Fresno County Department of Community Health inspected the “Meat Market” in Northwest Fresno, the source of the outbreak.  (6) At least two people were confirmed ill with E. coli infections in Michigan after eating ground beef produced by Davis Creek Meats and Seafood of Kalamazoo, Michigan. The E. coli outbreak prompted Davis Creek Meats and Seafood to recall approximately 129,000 pounds of beef products that were distributed in Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.  (7) Three Napa Valley children became sick from hamburger patties sold at a St. Helena Little League snack shack.  100,000 pounds of hamburger (that was a year old) was recalled.  And, (8) Several people were confirmed ill with E. coli infections in Pennsylvania after eating E. coli-contaminated meat products at Hoss’s Family Steak and Sea Restaurants, a Pennsylvania-based restaurant chain that purchased its meat from HFX, Inc., of South Claysburg, Pennsylvania. As a result of the outbreak, HFX recalled approximately 4,900 pounds of meat products.

One would think that with hundreds of Americans poisoned that Congress would ask one simple question – “What is going on?”  Congress needs to act now.  It is time for Congress to accept a leadership role and call hearings, not only to explore the reasons for the past months’ outbreaks, but also to help prevent the next one. Congress must reach out to all facets of the meat industry, from “farm to fork,” to consumers who bear the burden of illnesses, and to academics and regulators to find reasonable, workable solutions to prevent meat-related illnesses. More regulation may not help. Testing all products may not be feasible. More funding for enforcement for the CDC and USDA may not work. And, more funding for university research may also not be the answer. However, getting all to the same table is a start. Congress needs to do the inviting.

William D. Marler of Marler Clark LLP PS, (www.marlerclark.com) is a trial lawyer who represents victims of food-borne illnesses, and the father of three daughters.  Bill comments on food safety at www.marlerblog.com and can be reached at 1-206-719-4705.  A comprehensive overview of the problem can be found at: www.marlerblog.com/2007/09/articles/case-news/e-colitainted-hamburger-recalled-by-topps-tops-21700000-pounds/