Cost-benefit analysis for USDA FSIS’ implementation of its non-O157 STEC testing

FSIS has estimated the cost to the regulated industry and FSIS associated with the implementation of its non-O157 STEC testing on beef manufacturing trimmings, based on Agency testing data and information collected through the FSIS 2013 Pathogen Controls in Beef Operations Survey.

cost.benefitWe also assessed the benefits associated with the new testing. In addition, we estimated the cost and examined benefits of expanding its non- O157 STEC testing to ground beef and ground beef components other than beef manufacturing trimmings. The Agency concludes that the costs for sampling and testing are low and believes that the benefits justify the costs. However, FSIS was not able to quantify the benefits of expanding the testing.

This entry was posted in E. coli, Food Safety Policy and tagged , , , by Douglas Powell. Bookmark the permalink.

About Douglas Powell

A former professor of food safety and the publisher of barfblog.com, Powell is passionate about food, has five daughters, and is an OK goaltender in pickup hockey. Download Doug’s CV here. Dr. Douglas Powell editor, barfblog.com retired professor, food safety 3/289 Annerley Rd Annerley, Queensland 4103 dpowell29@gmail.com 61478222221 I am based in Brisbane, Australia, 15 hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time