The genetics behind Salmonella’s host specificity

Serovars, of Salmonella are specific to certain types of animals. Some infect cows, others poultry and still others affect primarily humans.

chicks.salmonellaResearch by a team led by University of Pennsylvania scientists has shown, using genomic techniques, that slight variations in the coding sequence of proteins that bind Salmonella to host cells can determine what type of animal a particular strain infects.

The work appears in Nature Communications.

“In Salmonella, we knew that many serovars are specific to one host; we didn’t know why, but we knew that they are,” said Dieter Schifferli, senior author on the paper and a professor of microbiology in Penn’s School of Veterinary Medicine. “In this work, we found strong associations between different serovars’ adhesin molecules and their preferred hosts, relationships that we then confirmed with work in the lab.”

The research relies on what are known as genome-wide association studies, or GWAS, in which the genomes of various strains of Salmonella were partially sequenced and then compared, looking at key characteristics. This work made use of an enormous library of Salmonella maintained by Penn Vet. It contains thousands of different strains, as well as samples from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Pennsylvania Department of Health and Institut Pasteur.

The scientists first focused their analyses on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, which is a leading cause of food poisoning but for which the molecular basis for host preferences is still a mystery.

The genomic analyses identified single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, which are variations in the nucleotide sequence of DNA. The scientists found a relatively large number of SNPs, particularly those that result in the production of a different amino acid, in genes coding for Salmonella surface proteins or secreted factors.

“We saw this huge variation in proteins on the surface of bacteria or in secretions, which are really the first lines of interaction with the host,” Schifferli said. “If there was so much variation, it suggests it must be linked to something important.”

Indeed, the researchers’ analysis showed that different host species tended to share patterns of these so-called non-synonymous SNPs, which create different protein sequences and structures.

Following these initial findings, the research team focused on genes for adhesin proteins, which play a key role in the interaction between bacteria and host. Analyzing 15 genes in 580 strains of Typhimurium, they found a high degree of variation and evidence of positive selection and strong evidence that the variation was associated with the particular strains’ host specificity.

With this statistical support in hand, the researchers went into the lab to test their findings. They chose to closely examine the adhesive properties of the protein FimH encoded by the gene fimH, which had shown the most variation in their previous analyses, a total of 17 variants, for their experiments. Selecting one variant that had been associated with human samples and another that had been associated with bovine samples, they introduced the variants into Escherichia coli and then tested the bacteria’s resulting binding affinity to cultured cells of either bovine or human origin.

Though the only difference between the two FimH variants was a single amino acid, they found that the bovine-associated FimH indeed bound preferentially to all bovine cells compared to the human-associated FimH. Selectively altering this one amino acid in a human-associated strain of Salmonella effectively reduced the ability of that strain to bind to human cells and increased its affinity for bovine cells.

“Manipulating bacteria in this way allowed us to show a cause and effect relationship between a SNP in an adhesin gene and the bacteria’s host specificity,” Schifferli said.

Further studies expanded this look to more serovars beyond Typhimurium, finding similar patterns of host-specific variation in the FimH protein.

A final set of experiments, again in the lab, expressed a variety of FimH variants from multiple serovars in E. coli, and tested their binding potential to porcine, human, bovine and chicken cells in culture. They found distinct species binding preferences for many of the FimH variants, confirming the host-specific associations they had seen in the in silico, or computational analyses.

Schifferli and colleagues plan to do similar genomic association studies to determine the genetic differences that may separate a strain of Salmonella that causes a brief gastrointestinal illness from one that cause a major systemic disease.

“The power of bacterial genomic association studies is that they can guide your work in the lab,” he said.

Scientists Evaluate Food Safety Practices to Help Support Nonprofit Food Pantries

From an NC State press release,

Researchers from North Carolina State University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have done an in-depth analysis of food safety at nonprofit food pantries that distribute food directly to people in need. While the work has identified shortcomings at many such pantries, the goal was to identify how food safety experts can help these pantries best meet the needs of their clients.Food-Pantry-HEADER-848x477

“We knew that food pantries, in North Carolina and many other states, aren’t regulated the same way that restaurants are, and that pantries are crucial distributors of food to those in need, but we did not have a good understanding of how food safety is practiced at food pantries,” says Ben Chapman, an associate professor of youth, family, and consumer sciences at NC State and senior author of a new paper on the work.

“This is a particularly important issue because research tells us that the people most likely to rely on help from food pantries are also those who have less access to health care to address foodborne illness in the event that they do get sick,” says Ashley Chaifetz, lead author of the paper. Chaifetz completed the research while a doctoral student at UNC-Chapel Hill.

For this study, the researchers examined operating procedures and interviewed managers at 105 food pantries in 12 counties across North Carolina. The researchers found that pantry food safety procedures were often informal.

In many ways, the results were promising.

For example, researchers found that virtually all pantries did a good job of limiting opportunities for cross-contamination and providing adequate handwashing facilities – both of which are incredibly important in reducing food safety risk.

However, the pantry managers lacked full information on storage and handling or did not have available resources to properly store all perishable items. Given the focus on health and poverty, many pantries have increased the amount of fresh produce and perishables they distribute, which require proper handling and refrigeration. But more than 75 percent of pantries didn’t provide volunteers with formal training on how to handle that food safely. Thirty-six percent of pantry managers didn’t have a system in place to obtain information on food safety recalls. Additionally, only 32 of the 105 pantries had a protocol in place on how to determine whether sick volunteers should be allowed to handle food.

“This is not about bashing food pantries, which provide an essential service to their communities on a shoestring budget,” Chapman says. “But we needed to identify areas of concern so that we could find ways to help them protect the communities they serve.

“Pantries are doing a lot of things right. Our goal was to develop tools to help them do even better, and to help protect underserved groups. We need to know where the gaps are to better support this incredibly important and passionate nonprofit sector.”

The research has already been used to develop a suite of free, online resources for food pantries, which has been used by nonprofits across North Carolina – both those that participated in the research and those that did not.

The paper, “Evaluating North Carolina Food Pantry Food Safety–Related Operating Procedures,” was published online Nov. 1 in the Journal of Food Protection. The work was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative grant 2012-68003-30155 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

For more information contact Ben Chapman (919 515 8099/benjamin_chapman@ncsu.edu).

Emergency food should be safe food

A few years ago an outbreak linked to a Denver homeless shelter made it into the barfblog new and notable category. Forty folks who depended on the emergency food were affected by violent foodborne illness symptoms after eating donated turkey. Fourteen ambulances showed up and took those most affected to area hospitals.

Volunteering as a food handler at a mission, shelter or soup kitchen and having a good heart and intentions doesn’t automatically lead to safe meals. An understanding of risks and having systems how to reduce them may.

Exposing individuals coping with food security and hunger to risky practices isn’t a good humanitarian approach. Last week KOMO News (Seattle) covered the possible closure of a free meal program for food safety reasons:HPIM3829

Every Thursday, Celeste Wilson whips up some of her best recipes. “They say it tastes very good because it’s Chinese food,” she said with a laugh. “It’s not just soup or salad or sandwich. Something different.”

Wilson is one of dozens of volunteers who makes food at home and then serves it at the Issaquah Community Hall.

As many as 80 people attend the free Thursday lunch as well as volunteer provided dinners, which are served seven days a week to countless people.

The diners come for something they wouldn’t have otherwise – a healthy, home cooked meal. But “home cooked” just got the attention of the Public Health of Seattle-King County, which says meals like these must be prepared in a commercial kitchen by someone with food safety certification.

“We don’t like to think of food in that way of having that potential of being the source that could make us sick. But just because we don’t know that someone has gotten sick, doesn’t mean that someone hasn’t. With food it’s very possible,” said Becky Elias, Manager of Food Protection and Water Recreation Programs at Public Health.

Around the same time as the Denver outbreak, colleague, friend and STEC CAP collaborator Christine Bruhn created a set of food safety materials for folks volunteering with food in their communities. Ashley Chaifetz, a former graduate student in the department of public policy at UNC-Chapel Hill took Christine’s content foundation and went out to the food pantry community to assess infrastructure and current food safety practices to tailor materials to the audience.

The assessment work was published in the November issue of the Journal of Food Protection:

Evaluating North Carolina Food Pantry Food Safety–Related Operating Procedures

Ashley Chaifetz, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Benjamin Chapman, North Carolina State University

Journal of Food Protection

Vol. 78, No. 11, 2015, Pages 2033–2042

DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-084

Abstract: Almost one in seven American households were food insecure in 2012, experiencing difficulty in providing enough food for all their members due to a lack of resources. Food pantries assist a food-insecure population through emergency food provision, but there is a paucity of information on the food safety–related operating procedures that pantries use. Food pantries operate in a variable regulatory landscape; in some jurisdictions, they are treated equivalent to restaurants, while in others, they operate outside of inspection regimes. By using a mixed methods approach to catalog the standard operating procedures related to food in 105 food pantries from 12 North Carolina counties, we evaluated their potential impact on food safety. Data collected through interviews with pantry managers were supplemented with observed food safety practices scored against a modified version of the North Carolina Food Establishment Inspection Report. Pantries partnered with organized food bank networks were compared with those that operated independently. In this exploratory research, additional comparisons were examined for pantries in metropolitan areas versus nonmetropolitan areas and pantries with managers who had received food safety training versus managers who had not. The results provide a snapshot of how North Carolina food pantries operate and document risk mitigation strategies for foodborne illness for the vulnerable populations they serve. Data analysis reveals gaps in food safety knowledge and practice, indicating that pantries would benefit from more effective food safety training, especially focusing on formalizing risk management strategies. In addition, new tools, procedures, or policy interventions might improve information actualization by food pantry personnel.

Handwashing is never enough: 60 sickened in E. coli outbreak at Washington fairgrounds

A total of 60 people likely were sickened during an E. coli outbreak at the Milk Makers Fest in April, according to a report issued Friday, Oct. 30, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Fair E coli 1About 1,325 Whatcom County first-grade students, plus the teachers and parents who accompanied them, from all school districts in Whatcom County went to the annual event April 21-23 at the Northwest Washington Fairgrounds in Lynden.

The event was designed to introduce young students to farming. It also gave them a chance to pet farm animals, including small horses, sheep, rabbits, chickens and a calf. There was a hay maze and scavenger hunt as well.

People who helped set up and take down the event — on April 20 and April 24 — also were among those who were sickened.

The new report provided additional details about the incident.

preliminary report was put out in June by health officials investigating the outbreak, and the findings were similar. Whatcom County and state health departments as well as the CDC were the investigators.

The CDC’s Oct. 30 report found that:

▪ Of the total number of people who were ill, 25 were confirmed through tests and 35 were probable. Eleven were hospitalized. Six developed hemolytic uremic syndrome, a life-threatening complication. There were no deaths.

In the earlier stages of the investigation, health officials identified cases that were confirmed or probable. Then they switched to confirmed cases only. The latest report returned to tracking both types of cases.

▪ Forty people who attended the event were sickened — 35 first-graders, three high school students, one parent and one teacher.

Twenty secondary cases — people who had contact with someone who went to the Milk Makers Fest — were identified in 14 siblings, four caretakers and two cousins of those who went to the event, the CDC wrote.

▪ The strain of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157: H7 that caused an outbreak was found in the north end of the dairy barn where the Milk Makers Fest was held, which was reported previously.

“Animals, including cattle, had been exhibited in the barn during previous events. Before the dairy education event, tractors, scrapers, and leaf blowers were used to move manure to a bunker at the north end of the barn,” the CDC reported stated.

▪ While it wasn’t possible to disinfect the barn, steps could have been taken to minimize risk, including hand-washing.

“Students attending the setup and breakdown might have had higher rates of illness because they consumed food in the barn and might not have washed their hands before eating,” the CDC stated. “Facility cleaning procedures and location of the manure bunker (inside the barn) might have contributed to an increased risk for infection among the attendees.”

What jumps out is leaf blowers used to move manure. That’s going to aerosolize and E. coli in the cow poop and no amount of handwashing will remove it.

Be the bug, think where these things are going to go and how they are going to make people barf.

Cockroach infested restaurant incurs hefty fines in Canberra

The former owner of a northside Thai restaurant who let cockroaches infest his kitchen and appliances has been ordered to pay fines worth thousands of dollars

rest.roach.canberraBen Thankum, the proprietor of Lao Thai Kitchen in Holt before it closed, allowed cockroaches to breed and die inside food tubs, on floors, walls and benches.

He was also charged with a failure to ensure clean surfaces, letting contaminated material spread in the kitchen and poor food storage procedures.

The restaurant was inspected by food safety officers in February 2014 who became concerned food sold at the shop would be unsafe for consumption.

Thankum appeared before the ACT Magistrates Court on Friday and was charged $2000 for each violation and ordered to pay court costs.

Court documents reveal the kitchen had fallen into disrepair with dead cockroaches left in dishwashing areas.

The documents also revealed food was stored in washing-up areas and sauces left on benches for eight hours at a time.

Ice buildup posed dangers in chest freezers with uncovered foods with exhaust fans clogged with grease.

Special magistrate Maria Doogan said the restaurant had since been sold and Thankum had begun working in a different occupation.

Almost 300 sickened: Brisbane Convention Centre food poisoning caused by Salmonella on stick blender

Tomorrow is Melbourne Cup day, the (horse) race that stops a nation.

melbourne.cup.hatsIt’s like the Kentucky Derby but nation-wide, and the hats are more outrageous.

The news has focused on fashion tips for Derby Day, but they should instead focus on tips for not barfing from raw egg-based dishes.

Two years ago on Melbourne Cup day, at least 220 people were felled by Salmonella and one was killed at Melbourne Cup functions in Brisbane, all linked to raw egg based dishes served by Piccalilli Catering.

In July 2015, at least 90 people were stricken with Salmonella after a fancy tea at the Langham Hotel in Melbourne. Australian health types confirmed it was Salmonella in raw-egg mayonnaise that was included in chicken sandwiches that were served at the $79 tea.

Fancy food ain’t safe food.

In Jan. 2015, at least 130 diners were stricken with Salmonella after being served ice cream containing raw eggs at Brisbane’s Chin Chin Chinese Restaurant. Dozens were hospitalized. Follow-up? Nothing

In May 2013, 160 diners at the Copa Brazilian restaurant in Canberra were struck down with Salmonella – it was the raw egg mayo that was then used in potato salad.

And so it goes.

The carnage continues from raw eggs in Australia (a table of known Australian-based is available at https://barfblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/raw-egg-related-outbreaks-australia-3-2-15.xlsx).

There are a few plausible explanations for the uniquely high number of Salmonella outbreaks related to raw egg dishes in Australia.

amy.melbourne.cup.12There is a particular form of food snobbery that disses the use of pasteurized eggs in the food pornography biz, even though you could lose your restaurant and life savings to one dish. On those few occasions I go out to eat, I ask the server if the mayo or aioli is made with raw eggs. They always come back and insist, of course it is made with raw eggs, the chef wouldn’t have it any other way.

Wrong answer.

In March, 2015, 250 teachers were stricken with Salmonella at a Brisbane conference, and an additional 20 people were sickened on the Gold Coast from the same egg supplier.

Some answers are now available, but only through access to information requests.

The Courier Mail reports this morning that a kitchen stick blender contaminated with Salmonella was the source of a mass food poisoning outbreak in Brisbane early this year.

About 250 people, mostly state school principals, fell ill and 24 people were admitted to hospital after eating at an education conference at the Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre in February.

Documents obtained by The Courier-Mail show that investigators examining the outbreak found bacteria on several kitchen utensils, with that bacteria “incubated’’ during the cooking process.

Test results from the investigation showed the people who fell ill were sick with the same strain of salmonella found on a kitchen stick blender “which demonstrates the source of the outbreak.”

Not quite. Salmonella has to get on the stick, whether it was introduced by humans or raw eggs or something else.

The documents rule out the possibility the outbreak was caused by eggs being contaminated before they arrived at the convention centre.

Wow.

“(Redacted) suggested that if the eggs were contaminated when they arrived, that this was the cause, however I advised … that poor cleaning and sanitising of the stick blender was the ultimate cause,’’ the documents say.

“(Redacted) questioned why the Sal. was not killed during the cooking process of the bread butter pudding. I advised that the QH microbiologist suggest that 140deg was not hot enough to kill Sal, but rather it was an incubation temp.’’

Brisbane City Council is now considering prosecuting the operators, with a decision due by the end of this year.

egg.dirty.feb.12Documents show the centre lost their five-star food safety rating from the council in the wake of the test results and they are yet to regain it.

A food safety audit found a “breakdown in cleaning and sanitising processes as indicated by the following positive swabs from 17/03/15”, with poor hand washing the reason for E. coli being found.

They found Salmonella on a larger robotic mixer and B. cereus on a smaller mixer, pastry brush and a whisk.

Convention centre general manager Robert O’Keeffe said the incident was the first of its type in the centre’s 20-year history.

That’s nice.

“Since the reported cases of illness, we have undertaken independent food safety audits, continued our testing processes for the sourcing, processing and delivery of safe food to our guests,” he said.

“All of our cooking practices and processes are monitored and recorded on our 24-hour computerised food safety monitoring system.”

He said the blender at the centre of the controversy had been removed and whole eggs taken off the menu.

“This means no eggshells, which potentially carry pathogens, will ever come into BCEC’s kitchens,” he said.

He said during the salmonella outbreak the eggs were not being sourced from their regular supplier.

I want pasteurized eggs used in mayo and aoili because this isn’t CSI and those UV goggles won’t tell a chef which egg has Salmonella.

In addition to popular culture, the chefs are merely responding to government advice.

Victoria Department of Health spokesman Bram Alexander said the Latham outbreak was a warning to cooks about the dangers of using raw eggs: “You have to store them properly, you have to handle them properly, prepare them properly, and don’t used cracked eggs.”

What the health spokesthingy wouldn’t say is: don’t serve dishes that contain raw eggs.

They say that in Canada and the U.S., but somehow, Australian regulators won’t directly say, don’t serve raw-egg containing dishes.

And that allows people like the Langham’s Melbourne managing director, Ben Sington, to say with a straight face, “we can confirm that all our eggs are sourced from a reputable and certified supplier and stored in accordance with food safety guidelines.”

A table of Australian egg outbreaks is available at https://barfblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/raw-egg-related-outbreaks-australia-3-2-15.xlsx.

Handwashing with Dr. Oz (‘never heard of him’)

I was talking to a medical doctor and a couple of his students, and a New York City trip is in the works, and I said I’d only been to NYC a couple of times, including when I was on Dr. Oz.

Dr. Oz“Who’s Dr. Oz?”

“A television celebrity medical doctor.”

“Why would he call himself Dr. Oz? Does he represent all of Australia?”

Communication breakdown.

One of the students explained who Dr. Mehmet Oz was and how he was spawned from Oprah.

“Never heard of him.”

Dr. Oz released a handwashing video and it’s not bad. They got the water temperature bit right (so please, everyone else stop saying it has to be warm water, that’s just a personal preference).

They also got the soap and friction bit right.

The 20-second bit? Not so right.

So I turned to handwasher-in-chief, Don Schaffner of Rutgers University, who offered the following comments:

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration model food code says two things: In section 2-301.12 it says “warm” water must be used for handwashing.  It’s isn’t science based as far as I know.

“In section 5-202.12 it says the handwash sink must provide water at a temperature of at least 38 °C (100 °F).  Also not science based.

“The video mentions 20 seconds.  As far as I know, that’s not science based either, and while it’s a perfectly fine length of time, 30 seconds would be better, and 15 seconds would be almost as good.”

Advice ain’t adherence: Sprout safety in Australia

Australia’s Food Safety Information Council says that outbreaks of foodborne illness have been associated with eating seed sprouts. Most seed sprouts are consumed raw, therefore do not receive any form of heat treatment prior to consumption which would inactivate pathogens (if present). A 2005 Salmonella outbreak in WA of 125 cases was linked to alfalfa sprouts  and a 2006 Salmonella outbreak of 15 cases in Victoria was linked to alfalfa sprouts.

sprout.salad.aust.aug.15To eat bean sprouts safely adhere to the use by date displayed on seed sprout packaging and follow storage directions on the seed sprout packaging and store seed sprouts at 5ºC or below. Avoid cross contamination from other risky foods such as meat or poultry. Washing sprouts has been found to be not very effective as laboratory studies have shown that bacteria can be internalised in the sprouts, making it difficult wash off/sanitise, and bacteria can be protected in a biofilm on the sprout surface. People in the 4 vulnerable demographics (young children, people 70+, immune-compromised or pregnant) should not eat uncooked sprouts of any kind.

That’s all good advice. But not enough.

Wal-Mart stopped selling raw sprouts a few years ago because they could not get a consistently safe supply. Raw sprouts are one of the few foods I will not eat, yet it is impossible to get a sandwich, in Australia, without sprouts or sprout remnants. And this pic (right)? It’s from an Australian hospital, home to the immunocompromised and pregnant.

As I always tell my kids, whether at home or the arena, less talk, more action.

Salmonella on tomato leaves

Thirty years ago, I was a graduate student inoculating different lines of tomatoes with Verticillium wilt.

I hated it.

tomato.verticilliumSo I became editor of the student newspaper.

But those plant pathogens and tomatoes are still embedded in my DNA, so when I see an abstract like this, I gotta send it out.

Plant pathogen infection is a critical factor for the persistence of Salmonella enterica on plants. We investigated the mechanisms responsible for the persistence of S. enterica on diseased tomato plants by using four diverse bacterial spot Xanthomonas species that differ in disease severities. Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and X. gardneri infection fostered S. enterica growth, while X. perforans infection did not induce growth but supported the persistence of S. enterica. X. vesicatoria-infected leaves harbored S. enterica populations similar to those on healthy leaves. Growth of S. enterica was associated with extensive water-soaking and necrosis in X. euvesicatoria- and X. gardneri-infected plants. The contribution of water-soaking to the growth of S. enterica was corroborated by an increased growth of populations on water-saturated leaves in the absence of a plant pathogen. S. enterica aggregates were observed with bacterial spot lesions caused by either X. euvesicatoria or X. vesicatoria; however, more S. entericaaggregates formed on X. euvesicatoria-infected leaves as a result of larger lesion sizes per leaf area and extensive water-soaking. Sparsely distributed lesions caused by X. vesicatoria infection do not support the overall growth of S. entericaor aggregates in areas without lesions or water-soaking; S. enterica was observed as single cells and not aggregates.

Thus, pathogen-induced water-soaking and necrosis allow S. enterica to replicate and proliferate on tomato leaves. The finding that the pathogen-induced virulence phenotype affects the fate of S. entericapopulations in diseased plants suggests that targeting of plant pathogen disease is important in controlling S. enterica populations on plants.

 Plant Pathogen-Induced Water-Soaking Promotes Salmonella enterica Growth on Tomato Leaves

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 81, Number 23, December 2015

N Potnis, J Colee, J Jones, J Barak

Sanitizers and produce: What works?

The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the effects of sanitizing treatments of fresh produce on Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes.

lettuce.skull.noroFrom 55 primary studies found to report on such effects, 40 were selected based on specific criteria, leading to more than 1,000 data on mean log reductions of these three bacterial pathogens impairing the safety of fresh produce. Data were partitioned to build three meta-analytical models that could allow the assessment of differences in mean log reductions among pathogens, fresh produce, and sanitizers. Moderating variables assessed in the meta-analytical models included type of fresh produce, type of sanitizer, concentration, and treatment time and temperature. Further, a proposal was done to classify the sanitizers according to bactericidal efficacy by means of a meta-analytical dendrogram.

The results indicated that both time and temperature significantly affected the mean log reductions of the sanitizing treatment (P < 0.0001). In general, sanitizer treatments led to lower mean log reductions when applied to leafy greens (for example, 0.68 log reductions [0.00 to 1.37] achieved in lettuce) compared to other, nonleafy vegetables (for example, 3.04 mean log reductions [2.32 to 3.76] obtained for carrots). Among the pathogens, E. coli O157:H7 was more resistant to ozone (1.6 mean log reductions), while L. monocytogenes and Salmonella presented high resistance to organic acids, such as citric acid, acetic acid, and lactic acid (∼3.0 mean log reductions). With regard to the sanitizers, it has been found that slightly acidic electrolyzed water, acidified sodium chlorite, and the gaseous chlorine dioxide clustered together, indicating that they possessed the strongest bactericidal effect.

The results reported seem to be an important achievement for advancing the global understanding of the effectiveness of sanitizers for microbial safety of fresh produce.

 Meta-analysis of the Effects of Sanitizing Treatments on Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes Inactivation in Fresh Produce

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 81, Number 23, December 2015

L Prado-Silva, V Cadavez, U Gonzales-Barron, A Rezende, A Sant’Ana

http://aem.asm.org/content/81/23/8008.abstract?etoc