Gastrointestinal outbreak confirmed at Canadian psycho ward

The London Health Sciences Centre (that’s in Canada) is in the midst of a gastrointestinal outbreak.

No Title ProvidedAM980 has confirmed an Alert Level Two outbreak has been called for gastrointestinal illness. The outbreak is confined to the 7th floor of the psychiatric ward at Victoria Hospital and the LHSC sent out a memo to staff.

This is the latest issue for the psychiatric ward, which just last week added security guards and visitor restrictions in the wake of what administration calls “an unacceptable level of safety for both our patients and staff.”

Medical Director of Infection Prevention and Control, Dr. Michael John, tells AM980 there have been at least four cases.

Bill Gates and Jimmy Fallon face off in a poop water taste test on ‘The Tonight Show’

On a recent episode of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, host Jimmy Fallon was challenged to a poop water taste test by philanthropist Bill Gates. In a scene reminiscent of The Princess Bride, Gates presented Fallon with two glasses of water, one containing bottled water, and the other containing water processed from sewage by the Janicki Omniprocessor.

As we’ve written previously, the Janicki Omniprocessor was developed as a way to cheaply and cleanly process sewage in developing nations while also providing power and clean drinking water. Earlier this year, a video released by Gates featured a demonstration of the Janicki Omniprocessor which included Gates sampling the water.

Opryland Norovirus case count now at 3

I first visited Music Row and Opryland in 1997 as part of the International Association for Food Protection annual meeting (I may have the year wrong).

John-Prine-300x199I went back to Music Row in 2004, to give a talk to a grocery group, oh, and catch John Prine one night and Lyle Lovett the next at the Ryman.

If my church wasn’t the local hockey arena, it would be the Ryman.

But over at the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center, Metro health officials now say that they have confirmed 3 Norovirus cases.

Metro Public Health Department officials have been working closely with Opryland Hotel and the Tennessee Department of Health since being asked by the hotel to investigate the cases last Thursday.

Being poor sucks, especially for foodborne illness

Foodborne illness is a major cause of morbidity and loss of productivity in developed nations. Although low socioeconomic status (SES) is generally associated with negative health outcomes, its impact on foodborne illness is poorly understood.

vomit.toiletWe conducted a systematic review to examine the association between SES and laboratory-confirmed illness caused by eight important foodborne pathogens.

We completed this systematic review using PubMed for all papers published between 1 January 1980 and 1 January 2013 that measured the association between foodborne illness and SES in highly developed countries and identified 16 studies covering four pathogens. The effect of SES varied across pathogens: the majority of identified studies for Campylobacter, salmonellosis, and E. coli infection showed an association between high SES and illness. The single study of listeriosis showed illness was associated with low SES. A reporting bias by SES could not be excluded. SES should be considered when targeting consumer-level public health interventions for foodborne pathogens.

 The impact of socioeconomic status on foodborne illness in high-income countries: a systematic review

Epidemiology and Infection [ahead of print]

K.L. Newman, J.S. Leon, P.A. Rebolledo and E. Scallan

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9528372&fileId=S0950268814003847

Maybe they offer a food science degree: Cockroaches force closure of Merrimack College dining hall

Guess god couldn’t prevent a cockroach infestation.

buddt,christMerrimack College, a Roman Catholic college in Mass closed its main dining hall Tuesday.

The North Andover [MA] Health Department inspected the dining hall, called Sparky’s Place, after receiving an anonymous complaint, said Thomas Trowbridge, chairman of the town’s health board.

The inspectors closed Sparky’s, which is located on the second floor of a college building, after finding unsanitary conditions and a pest infestation. A kitchen located in the building’s basement was also closed, Trowbridge said.

Within two hours of the closings, town and college officials as well as food service company representatives met, and the college ordered a thorough professional cleaning, Trowbridge said.

 

Justin Timberlake’s old restaurant closed because of poop

Amid his many talents, it’s sometimes difficult to remember that Justin Timberlake is also an entrepreneur who once had dreams of restaurant-world domination.

jt.soup.snlRecall those days now while you enjoy this newly unearthed nugget of information about Justin’s former restaurant Destino.

Destino, despite being generally well-liked and frequented by famous clientele, closed in 2013 due to what was at the time called a “flood problem.” But thanks to a new lawsuit filed by the restaurant’s partners against their insurance company, it’s now clear that the “flood” in question was actually a torrent of human shit, or as Jezebel’s Kitchenette blog brilliantly puts it, “a localized doody hurricane.” Bon appetit!


 

Going public: Standards aim to cut down on Salmonella and campy in poultry pieces

The U.S. government is pushing the poultry industry to make their chicken and turkey a little safer with new standards aimed at reducing the number of cases of foodborne illness by 50,000 a year.

chicken.cook.thermometerThe proposed standards announced Wednesday by the Agriculture Department apply to the most popular poultry products — chicken breasts, legs and wings, and ground chicken and turkey. They are voluntary but designed to pressure companies to lower rates of salmonella and campylobacter, another pathogen that can cause symptoms similar to salmonella, in their products.

Among the measures companies could take to reduce the rates of those pathogens: better screening of flocks and better sanitation.

The proposal would ask poultry producers to reduce the rates of salmonella in raw chicken parts from around 24 percent now to less than 16 percent, and campylobacter rates in raw chicken parts from 22 percent to 8 percent. Rates also would be reduced in ground chicken and turkey, and sampling would be done over a longer period of time to ensure accuracy.

The Agriculture Department says the standards could eventually reduce salmonella and campylobacter illnesses linked to raw poultry by about a quarter, or 50,000 illnesses a year.

“We are taking specific aim at making the poultry items that Americans most often purchase safer to eat,” said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.

Ashley Peterson of the National Chicken Council said the industry has already made improvements. She said poultry companies have been exploring options to reduce contamination, including

The standards come after a lengthy outbreak of salmonella illnesses linked to California chicken company Foster Farms, which sickened more than 600 people between March 2013 and July 2014. In 2013, USDA said inspectors at Foster Farms facilities had documented “fecal material on carcasses” along with poor sanitation.

Foster Farms took measures to improve its sanitation and screening, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now says the company’s products have less than 5 percent salmonella.

chicken.thingies.raw.cookVilsack said the Foster Farms outbreaks led the department to realize it needed to be more focused on reducing salmonella in chicken parts. The department already had standards in place for whole carcasses, but not individual parts like breasts and wings. The new proposal would cover the parts, which the USDA says is about 80 percent of chicken available for purchase.

USDA also would make public which companies are meeting the standards or going beyond them, and which companies have more work to do, giving companies more incentive to comply.

The secretary said companies should realize that complying is good business. “It’s in the long-term best interest of the market to have safer food,” Vilsack said.

“These new standards, as well as improved testing patterns, will have a major impact on public health,” said USDA Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety Al Almanza. “The proposed changes are another way we’re working to meet the ever-changing food safety landscape and better protect Americans from foodborne illness.”

“Getting more germs out of the chicken and turkey we eat is an important step in protecting people from foodborne illness,” said Robert V. Tauxe, MD, deputy director of the Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “I look forward to seeing fewer Americans get sick as a result of these proposed changes.”

A pathogen reduction performance standard is the measure that FSIS uses to assess the food safety performance of facilities that prepare meat and poultry products. By making the standards for ground poultry tougher to meet, ground poultry products nationwide will have less contamination and therefore result in fewer foodborne illnesses. FSIS implemented performance standards for whole chickens in 1996 but has since learned that Salmonella levels increase as chicken is further processed into parts. Poultry parts like breasts, wings and others represent 80 percent of the chicken available for Americans to purchase. By creating a standard for chicken parts, and by performing regulatory testing at a point closer to the final product, FSIS can greatly reduce consumer exposure to Salmonella and Campylobacter.

The federal register notice is available on FSIS’ website at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulations/federal-register/federal-register-notices.


chickenConsumer Federation of America today applauded the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) for issuing the first ever performance standards for Salmonella and Campylobacter for raw poultry parts and updated standards for ground poultry.

“Pathogen rates on poultry parts and ground poultry are way too high,” said Chris Waldrop, Director of the Food Policy Institute at Consumer Federation of America. “These standards are essential to protect consumers and help drive down rates of contamination in these products.”

FSIS’ performance standards related to poultry have historically focused only on poultry carcasses. While reducing contamination on the carcass is critical, this approach has failed to address contamination levels once the bird is cut up into parts or processed into ground poultry. FSIS’ own testing revealed high prevalence levels of contamination on raw chicken parts – 24.02% for Salmonella and 21.70% for Campylobacter.  FSIS’ previous standards for ground poultry only addressed Salmonella (and not Campylobacter) and were set at nearly 50% so that a plant could fail almost half of FSIS’ sampling set and still meet the standard.

FSIS’ previous approach also did not account for the way consumers’ poultry purchases have changed over the years. Consumers today are more likely to purchase poultry parts such as breasts, wings and thighs, or ground poultry, than they are to purchase whole birds.

 

Does it make you barf? EU’s food safety agency gives green light to Bisphenol A

I worry about the things that make people barf.

madmagI don’t worry too much about the outliers that make headlines like genetically engineered foods, pesticides, and bisphenol A.

I worry about the things that make people barf.

The European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) re-evaluation of Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure and toxicity states that BPA, an endocrine disruptor, poses no health risk to consumers of any age group at current exposure levels.

EFSA, which carries the scientific risk assessment on behalf of the EU, says exposure from a diet, or from a combination of sources such as a diet, dust, cosmetics and thermal paper, is considerably under the safe level, also known as the ‘tolerable daily intake’ (TDI).

BPA is a chemical compound used in the manufacture of food contact materials such as re-usable plastic tableware and can coatings. Another widespread use of BPA is in thermal paper commonly used in cash register receipts.

Residues of BPA can migrate into food and beverages and be ingested by the consumer, and other sources include thermal paper, cosmetics and dust can be absorbed through the skin and by inhalation.

Although new data have led EFSA’s experts to considerably reduce the safe level of BPA from 50 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day to four, the highest estimates for dietary exposure, or via a combination of sources, are three to five times lower than the new TDI.

Dr Trine Husøy, a member of EFSA’s expert panel on food contact materials and Chair of its BPA working group, said the panel decided to reevaluate the safety of BPA because of the publication of a huge number of new research studies in recent years.

bpa.freeThis led to a public consultation in early 2014, and after weighing up new scientific information on its toxic effects, the CEF Panel concluded that high doses of BPA (hundreds of times above the TDI) are likely to adversely affect the kidney and liver. It may also cause effects on the mammary gland in animals.

“Effects on the reproductive, nervous, immune, metabolic and cardiovascular systems, as well as in the development of cancer are not considered likely at present but they could not be excluded on the available evidence. So, they add to the overall uncertainty about BPA-related hazards and therefore have been considered in the assessment,” Husøy said.

EFSA last assessed dietary exposure to BPA in 2006 when less data was available. 

Testing matters: EU Interlaboratory comparison study food on detection of Salmonella in minced chicken meat

In 2013, it was shown that 32 out of 35 National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) in the European Union were able to detect high and low levels of Salmonella in minced chicken meat. Two laboratories made an initial transcription error when processing the raw data, which led to their performance being rated as ‘moderate’.

kevin.allen.labOne laboratory continued to underperform during the follow-up study. Despite a significant improvement, this laboratory still had a sensitivity problem in the detection of Salmonella. Depending on the method used, the laboratories detected Salmonella in 61 to 78% of the contaminated samples. The detection of Salmonella in this study was made more difficult because of high levels of “interfering” bacteria in the minced chicken meat. These are some of the conclusions of the Sixth EU Interlaboratory Comparative Study of Food Samples, which was organized by the European Union Reference Laboratory for Salmonella (EURL-Salmonella).

Interlaboratory comparative study obligatory for EU Member States
The study was conducted in September 2013, with a follow-up study in January 2014. Participation was obligatory for all EU Member State NRLs that are responsible for the detection of Salmonella in food samples. EURL-Salmonella is part of the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
The laboratories used three internationally accepted analysis methods (RVS, MKTTn and MSRV) to detect the presence of Salmonella in minced chicken meat. Each laboratory received a package of minced chicken meat contaminated with two different concentrations of Salmonella Infantis, or containing no Salmonella at all. The laboratories were required to analyse the samples for the presence of Salmonella in accordance with the study protocol. In this study, the RVS and MSRV analysis methods produced significantly better results than the MKTTn method in terms of detecting Salmonella in minced chicken meat. This underscores the benefits of using more than one analysis method.

collaboration.powellTwo new procedures were introduced and were positively received. For the first time, a food matrix was artificially contaminated with a diluted culture of Salmonella at the EURL-Salmonella laboratory. The NRLs were no longer required to combine the Salmonella samples. The feasibility of this procedure for subsequent studies will be assessed for each study. Furthermore, the participating laboratories were able to submit their findings via the Internet. This procedure will be optimized and continued.