South Korean firm recalls Salmonella-infected milk

Binggrae, a major food firm, has recalled thousands of milk cartons found to be infected with Salmonella, the company said Thursday.

melon.milkThe company recalled some 128,000 340-milliliter cartons of “melon milk” after the company received a lab report indicating the presence of the bacterium.

The products were processed in a company factory in Gimhae, south Gyeongsang Province, on March 31 with a marked expiration date of April 11.

“We decided to recall all the products before they reach consumers. The factory has put on hold the production for the moment, and our officials are conducting an on-site inspection,” the company official added.  

“We hope consumers will understand our effort in dealing with the problem in a prompt manner. From now on, we promise to toughen our safety measure in the manufacture process.”

Money where your mouth is: A shortage of funds for US food safety

The N.Y. Times writes in an editorial that a farsighted food safety law enacted in 2011 has faced obstacles to meaningful enforcement ever since, including delays in issuing necessary rules and a shortage of money.

restaurant.inspectionNow, in what may become the latest shameful chapter, Congress seems unwilling to provide enough money to effectively carry out regulations that are about to be issued. The losers, of course, will continue to be consumers, who live with the hazards of an unsafe food supply.

The Food Safety Modernization Act was designed to prevent deadly outbreaks, not just react to them. It put the burden on food producers to make sure that their products are safe and to develop plans to prevent contamination. It also gave the F.D.A. new powers to set standards for harvesting fresh produce, recall tainted foods and monitor produce imported from abroad.

The Congressional Budget Office had estimated that the F.D.A. would need a total of $580 million from 2011-15 to carry out its reforms. That is a pittance for policing an enormous sector of the nation’s economy and barely noticeable in the vast federal budget. Yet Congress has appropriated less than half that amount — roughly $162 million — over the five-year period.

The president’s budget request for fiscal year 2016, which starts in October, asks for an appropriation of $109.5 million, an increase from $27.5 million in the current year. In addition, it calls for an increase of almost $192 million in user fees from the industry that it is virtually certain not to get. The F.D.A. in its last five budget requests proposed user fees that would cover the bulk of the costs, but Congress rejected those proposals after industry lobbying.

That’s all nice, but the industry that profits from selling food should be taking control and far exceeding government standards, as Costco and Walmart have done.

Market microbial food safety at retail and stop hucksterism: Brisbane campaign to buy local produce

It’s not a new superbug, it’s an outbreak of super stupidity.

A Brisbane TV station finally woke up to Australia’s egg problem, and titled their investigation (bottom), Scientists fear super strain of bacteria behind food poisoning outbreak.

Raw_eggThis refers to the numerous egg-related outbreaks in Queensland and throughout Australia, largely related to a chef snobbery that they have to make their own aioli or mayo using raw eggs.

A table of raw egg related outbreaks in Australia is available at https://barfblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/raw-egg-related-outbreaks-australia-3-12-15-2.pdf or https://barfblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/raw-egg-related-outbreaks-australia-3-12-15.xlsx

And in response to the 32 Australians that have been stricken with Hepatitis A from imported frozen fruit, a new initiative is targeting Brisbane shoppers to support local farmers by buying local produce.

Every time some in Brisbane gets religion about buying local, I point out that’s much easier in a sub-tropical climate than, say, Canada.

The scheme involves 100 independent grocers and is backed by Brisbane’s Produce Markets. 

Greengrocer Joseph Guardala said the “hand picked” message was aimed at family shoppers.

He claims greengrocers have better fruit and vegetables than major supermarkets, because they specialize in it.

“They don’t want imported stuff, they want their local fruit to and veg to be locally grown here,” he said

He visits the Brisbane Markets every morning to source the produce for his store, Indooroopilly Fruit. 

“I’m hand picking everything, I’m tasting everything, I open boxes, I even pick through pallets every day, just to get my 24 grapes that I exactly want,” he said.

Here’s hoping you washed your hands properly before spreading Norovirus on all that fresh fruit and veg you touch.

New rules for Dubai shawarma shops coming up

New food safety rules for Dubai shawarma shops are expected soon and will cover the way eggs are used in mayonnaise for shawarmas as well as the space, layout, cooking, and storage standards for the outlet, among other points.

shawarma1013_1_portraitTheir comments came on the sidelines of the announcement of a campaign to train and educate some 4,000 food handlers in Dubai on food safety.

The campaign, run by the municipality and Unilever Food Solutions, was announced on April 7, World Health Day, which this year focused on food safety.

The shawarma rules could be implemented or announced by the end of April but it is understood outlets will be given a grace period to fully comply.

Shawarma, an Arabic meal made from shreds of grilled chicken or meat pieces rolled in pita bread, is one of the most common snacks enjoyed by Emiratis and expats.

The meat is piled up in boneless slices in a cylinder shape around a large central skewer rotated over a vertical grill.

Shawarma stands, attached to restaurants, are abundant in the UAE. They used to be found in the open air before officials directed they be moved indoors or confined in an enclosure.

On Tuesday, municipality officials said there was already an exhaustive Food Code available for all food outlets to help them comply with the hundreds of existing food safety rules to a greater degree.

Bobby Krishna, the department’s principal food inspection officer, said inspectors “occasionally find salmonella” contamination in shawarma shops and that some shawarma makers use raw eggs — susceptible to salmonella — instead of pasteurised eggs to make their own mayonnaise, which will not be allowed (Australia, are you listening?)

“If one person has an infected egg, one person falls sick. If you use that egg in mayonnaise — which will go into many shawarmas — many people will fall sick,” he added.

Chicken, the most popular meat used in shawarma, is another food source more commonly associated with salmonella infections than other foodstuffs.

“We are going very risk-specific. You don’t wait for food poisoning to occur. Shawarma by its nature is risk-prone. We occasional find salmonella; we found some unfit samples.”

He stressed however “we are not saying ‘don’t eat shawarma’.”

Listeria in low moisture foods? Sure. Sabra hummus recalled; I chucked mine

My kids don’t eat much. Their staples include bagels, buns, peanut butter, carrots, apple sauce.

And hummus.

Their brand of choice is Sabra.

I just got home from a hockey game (a 7-2 loss, we got smoked) and opened up my email and saw that a few Sabra hummus products have been recalled due to Listeria. According to a recall notice on the FDA website, it’s only few specific lots, and the recall was initiated following a routine sample by Michigan regulatory folks found contamination.SubstandardFullSizeRender-1

And I’m left with a bunch of questions. I need to know this stuff to better understand the risk to my kids.

How much contamination was there (10 cfu/g? 1,000,000 cfu/g?)?

How long was the product in storage/transport before I bought it. Now that I think of it, how long has it been in my fridge?

The stuff I have been feeding my kids has different codes. Were the containers I have made in the same facility? On the same line?

And why is Sabra so specific about the recalled SKUs? Did they have a sanitation clean break between lots?

SubstandardFullSizeRender-4Have they validated their sanitation procedures?

How well did the sanitation crew do their job?

We’ve seen other recalls expand as further information is discovered, will this one?

In the absence of answers (to stuff that should go into a recall notice) I’m chucking the half-finished containers.

And we’ll buy a different brand tomorrow.

 

Seafood Safety 101: Vibrio in Shellfish

I’m collaborating with Matt Shipman, public information officer at NC State University and curator of The Abstract, on a set of food safety-related posts from other NCSU folks as we roll toward WHO’s World Health Day on April 7– which is focused this year on food safety. Here’s a post on Vibrio in shelfish by Liz Bradshaw, a postdoctoral research scholar in NoroCORE – the Norovirus Collaborative for Outreach, Research, and Education, based at NC State. 

People around the world are eating more and more seafood, and if you’re from the southeastern United States, oysters and other shellfish are a desirable delicacy for many. Most people are aware that eating raw or undercooked seafood can put them at risk for food-related illness, and while they have seen the warnings on restaurant menus, but may not know the specific microbes to blame. This post focuses on what is arguably the most important pathogen found in seafood (which is also on the rise) – Vibrio bacteria.Oysters-848x477

Vibrio refers to a genus of Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria, and they are found naturally in brackish and saltwater environments, as they need salt to survive and grow. They also like to multiply in warm water, and the majority of human cases happen in the summer months. Out of around a dozen Vibrio species that cause disease in people, two species – V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus– are most often associated with eating raw or undercooked seafood, particularly molluscan shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels, and cockles). These bacteria can also enter through a wound or by ingesting seawater, but these cases are less common.

V. parahaemolyticus usually causes watery diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, sometimes with a fever and chills. People are usually sick for three days, and though unpleasant, the majority of people recover just fine, without needing prescription medications. The CDC estimates there are 35,000 V. parahaemolyticus cases a year in the United States.

V. vulnificus is a rarer but more sinister creature, and is often associated with fatalities. Most people with V. vulnificus experience symptoms similar to V. parahaemolyticus, but the bacteria are a particular threat to those who are immunocompromised or have underlying health conditions such as liver disease, diabetes, or cancer. In these patients, the bacteria can enter the bloodstream (septicemia), causing severe fever, skin lesions, and shock. Around 50 percent of these patients die, and that is often in the face of aggressive antibiotic treatment and supportive care, which is more than a little scary.  V. vulnificusinfection is, however, a rare disease; there are only about 30 cases a year in the United States.

The incubation periods (the time between eating the contaminated shellfish and becoming sick) are quite different for the two bacteria. V. parahaemolyticus starts making itself known around two to 48 hours after exposure, while V. vulnificus takes one to seven days. A clinical diagnosis using bacterial culture is still needed to be sure Vibrio is the culprit, in large part because symptoms like nausea and vomiting, and even the more severe septicemia, can be caused by a wide variety of microbes.

Norovirus-Liz-B-headshotUnfortunately, Vibrio cases have been on the rise, and according to the CDC’s most recent Food Safety Progress Report, we saw a 75 percent increase in cases in 2013 compared to 2006-2008, and a 32 percent increase compared to 2010-2012 in the United States.  The majority of these 2013 cases (62 percent, or 144 cases) were V. parahaemolyticus, and 9 percent (21 cases) were V. vulnificus. It is also believed that for every V. parahaemolyticus case that is reported, there are 142 cases that go undiagnosed. This is probably due to an underreporting of cases, as many laboratories do not use the special culture media needed to grow the bacteria. To improve our understanding of the impacts these bacteria, Vibrio infections were made a notifiable disease in 2007, which means that lab-confirmed cases have to be reported to the state health departments, which then inform the CDC. Unfortunately, we know considerably less about the significance of Vibrio infections in other parts of the world.

For the love of the food, oyster aficionados have created some interesting myths on how to reduce their risk of disease from eating raw oysters, such as the notion that covering the oysters in hot sauce will kill bacteria. The old adage about only eating oysters in months containing an “R” has been around since the 1500’s, and while the V. vulnificus levels in water are higher in the summer months, the CDC says that 40 percent of cases actually occur in the R-containing months between September and April. Similarly, some people think they can tell when an oyster is not safe to eat, but Vibrio bacteria do not change the taste, smell, or appearance of shellfish.

Thankfully, the bacteria are quite susceptible to heat.  People can reduce their risk of infection by ordering cooked oysters when they go to restaurants, or when preparing oysters at home, to follow a few simple precautions, which are outlined at Foodsafety.gov.

References:

CDC. 2014. Notes from the Field: Increase in Vibrio parahaemolyticus Infections Associated with Consumption of Atlantic Coast Shellfish – 2013. MMWR 63(15): p. 335-336. Accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6315a6.htm?s_cid=mm6315a6_x

CDC. 2014. Incidence and Trends of Infection with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food – Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2006–2013. MMWR 63(15): 328 – 332. Accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6315a3.htm?s_cid=mm6315a3_w

CDC. 2015. Vibrio illness (Vibriosis). Accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/vibrio/

FDA. 2014. Raw Oyster Myths. Accessed at http://www.fda.gov/Food/ResourcesForYou/HealthEducators/ucm085385.htm

Foodsafety.gov. 2015. Vibrio infections. Accessed at http://www.foodsafety.gov/poisoning/causes/bacteriaviruses/vibrio_infections/

US wants egg executives punished for Salmonella outbreak

A judge should consider the “widespread harm” done by a major 2010 salmonella outbreak and the food safety lapses that preceded it in sentencing two egg industry executives whose company was responsible, prosecutors said Monday.

salmonella.eggsIn punishing them next week, U.S. District Judge Mark Bennett should consider that Austin “Jack” DeCoster and his son Peter ran a massive egg production operation that “routinely disregarded food safety standards and practices,” assistant U.S. Attorney Peter Deegan wrote in a sentencing memorandum.

Jack DeCoster, 80, of Turner, Maine, and 51-year-old Peter DeCoster, of Clarion, Iowa are scheduled to be sentenced April 13 by U.S. District Judge Mark Bennett in a federal courtroom in Sioux City, Iowa. Both pleaded guilty last year to introducing adulterated eggs into interstate commerce and face up to one year in jail.

Under the terms of the plea agreement, prosecutors did not ask for a specific term of jail, home confinement or probation. But the 14-page memo outlined illegal and unethical food safety practices that repeatedly happened on their watch, and argued the sentences should send a message to other corporate executives to “act responsibly when it comes to food safety.”

The DeCosters and their company, Quality Egg, knew that their Iowa egg facilities were at risk for contamination long before the 2010 outbreak, which sickened thousands, Deegan argued.

Why breast is best: Some online breast milk might contain cow’s milk

I’m grateful that all five of my daughters were breast-fed for varying lengths of time (because, every kid is different).

breast.feedingFor those who can’t breast feed, for whatever reason, I can see the appeal of buying breast milk from another source, but like any other food, there’s a lot of huckters and buskers out there.

Human breast milk has been sold online for years, and health experts have warned about possible dangers. Now they have a new warning: Some of the milk for sale isn’t strictly human — it’s been topped off with cow’s milk.

That milk could be dangerous for some babies, says Sarah Keim, a researcher at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.

Keim led a study published Monday in Pediatrics that shows 10 out of 102 breast milk samples purchased online contained at least 10% cow’s milk. The added milk could have come straight from cartons or from baby formula, Keim says.

“It could be very harmful to babies with allergies or intolerance” to cow’s milk, she says.

In a previous study using the same samples, Keim found 75% were contaminated with viruses or bacteria.

The Food and Drug Administration has warned since 2010 that milk sold or shared online could be unsafe.

The samples in the study, purchased in 2012, came from several sites, Keim says, including one called Only The Breast that continues to operate and appears to be the leading site for such transactions. Other sites, such as Eats on Feets and Human Milk 4 Human Babies, facilitate the sharing of milk but discourage sales.

World Health Day 2015, Food Safety – the Global View

The message bears repeating: On World Health Day 2015, the World Health Organization and Europe estimates that levels of foodborne disease are much higher than currently reported and underlines the need for improved collaboration among sectors to lower the health risks associated with unsafe food.

who.food.safe.dayOur food chain is longer and more complex than ever before, and demographic, cultural, economic and environmental developments – globalized trade, travel and migration, an ageing population, changing consumer trends and habits, new technologies, emergencies, climate change and extreme weather events – are increasing foodborne health risks. 

“The fact that we significantly underestimate how many people become ill from chemicals in the food chain and from common microorganisms such as Salmonella and Campylobacter should start alarm bells ringing across the many areas with a stake in our food chain. A failure in food safety at any link in this chain, from the environment, through primary production, processing, transport, trade, catering or in the home, can have significant health and economic consequences,” says Dr Zsuzsanna Jakab, WHO Regional Director for Europe.

*Contamination from a single source may become widespread and have enormous health and economic consequences. In 2011, for example, an enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) outbreak in Germany and France, linked to imported contaminated fenugreek seeds, led to almost 4000 cases of EHEC infection in 16 countries, including more than 900 haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) cases and 55 deaths. The estimated loss for farmers and industries was US$ 1.3 billion.

*Changes in animal food production are leading to an increase in the emergence and spread of zoonotic diseases. Of 335 emerging infectious disease events in humans between 1940 and 2004, it is estimated that 60% were transmitted from animals and many of these were foodborne. 

who.factors1-300x178WHO calls on policy-makers:

*To build and maintain adequate food safety systems and infrastructures, including laboratory capacities and surveillance and reporting systems; 

*To respond to and manage food safety risks along the entire food chain, including during emergencies;

*To foster multisectoral collaboration among public health, animal health, agriculture and other sectors for better communication, information sharing and joint action;

*To integrate food safety into broader food policies and programmes (e.g. nutrition and food security);

*To think globally and act locally to ensure that food produced domestically is as safe as possible internationally.

World Health Day 2015, celebrated on 7 April, is an opportunity to recognize the important food safety role of all those involved in food production, and to strengthen collaboration and coordination among these various areas, in order to prevent, detect and respond to foodborne diseases efficiently and cost-effectively. A kaleidoscope of events is planned across the globe. 

People are also invited to engage through social media and to promote “From farm to plate: make food safe” using the hashtag #safefood.

The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) says to be able to meet the demand for milk, eggs and meat and guarantee their safety, it is first of all essential to control pathogens in animals on the farm.

Eliminating or controlling food hazards at source has proved more effective than an approach relying solely on checking the finished product.

 

Street food vendors in Hyderabad, India have some food safety issues

I’m a food truck kind of guy, but I prefer to eat from places that have to follow the basic rules of sanitation. In North Carolina mobile food vendors have to be linked up with a physical kitchen (for cooling and prepping food) and even then they are inspected. Keeping food safe in a truck can be done, but it takes vigilance and a sense of hazard identification.

And not using water from a toilet.1680787-poster-1280-water-reuse-graphic

Like what the Times of India reported about some street food vendors in Hyderabad, India.

Every sixth Hyderabadi taking street food is falling sick from food-borne infections (whoa, I’d like to see the data -ben), says a study that directly observed the hygienic practices followed by 500 food vendors and small restaurants in different parts of the city. 

The most common ailments reported by denizens after eating street food or ‘stale’ food served by some established restaurants are diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, reveals a study released to mark the ‘food safety’ theme on World Health Day. 

And here’s why: The majority of street food vendors (423 out of 500 surveyed) were found drawing untreated water for cooking from nearby apartments, while only seven were using protective head cover. None were using protective gloves and almost all used nearby shops to dump their raw material overnight. 

“Our team, which also communicated with customers, came across around 50 vendors with tobacco addiction, leaving the remnants of the ash on the food being served,” said Dr K Suresh, president of Osmania Medical College Doctors’ Forum, who led the study. 

Worse, 15 out of 500 vendors were found drawing water for cooking from toilets of nearby apartments, while almost all were found to skip hand washing after a visit to the toilet or lavatory. This is what the 30-member team of MBBS undergraduates led by Dr Suresh found after analyzing data gathered from street- vendors from December-2014 to February-2015.