Some NZ fruit potentially contaminated with Hepatitis A

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is cautioning New Zealand consumers of a small quantity of fresh fruit sold in late February and early March that there is a relatively low risk that this fruit had been contaminated with Hepatitis A virus.

MPI Deputy Director General Scott Gallacher says, “We have been advised that a person packing some varieties of apples and peaches in a Hawke’s Bay New-Zealand-Royal-Gala-Red-Apple-2pcs1packhouse has been diagnosed with Hepatitis A.

“This worker handled Royal Gala and New Zealand Beauty apples and Golden Queen peaches over a four day period while they would have been infectious. Hepatitis A virus can remain infectious on the surface of fruit for some months and transmit infection to other handlers and consumers.”

Mr Gallacher says while some potentially affected fruit has been traced and withdrawn from sale, it is expected that approximately 1400 cartons have been sold, with fruit either consumed or still in some people’s homes.

Mr Gallacher says all fruit involved in this case was for domestic New Zealand supply and has not been exported.

Dole brand Italian Blend Salad recalled in Canada due to Listeria

There’s not a lot of lettuce being grown in Canada in this winter-of-winters, so where was the Dole brand Italian Blend salad grown, or processed, that was recalled due to possible Listeria contamination?

This recall was triggered by Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) test results. The CFIA is conducting a food safety investigation, which may lead to the recall of dole.italian.blend.salad.mar.14other products. If other high-risk products are recalled the CFIA will notify the public through updated Food Recall Warnings.

There have been no reported illnesses associated with the consumption of this product.

14 dead; Sweden listeria outbreak linked to cold meats

The Swedish National Food Agency (Livsmedelsverket) has identified cold meats as the primary source for a recent outbreak of listeria in Sweden that has been connected to the deaths of up to 14 people since autumn 2013.

The agency plans to conduct a four-week intensive, on-site spot-inspection of all plants producing cold meats in Sweden this month and next to appraise what listeriasteps companies are taking to ensure listeria-free production areas.

More than 80 cases of the deadly bacteria have been detected in Sweden since September 2013, and 27 of these involved infections contracted from the same bacteria strain.

In the latest development, the Swedish supermarket chain Axfood recalled smoked ham and garlic salami meats after listeria was found in the Garant meat brand’s facility that produces cold cuts for supermarkets and delis. The recall includes both the 252 stores directly owned by Axfood and the 820 proprietor-run stores with which it co-operates under partnership agreements.

Lots of Listeria in Italian mozzarella cheese – but is it high risk?

Following a Listeria monocytogenes detection in a mozzarella cheese sampled at a dairy plant in Lazio Region, further investigations have been conducted both by the competent Authority and the food business operator (as a part of dairy factory HACCP control).

In total, 90 dairy products, 7 brine and 64 environmental samples have been tested. The prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes was 24.4% in mozzarella cheese, and 9.4% in listeriaenvironmental samples, while brines were all negatives.

Forty-seven strains of L. monocytogenes have been isolated, all belonging to 4b/4e serotype. In 12 of these, the macrorestriction profile has been determined by means of pulsed field gel electrophoresis. The profiles obtained with AscI enzyme showed a 100% similarity while those obtained with ApaI a 96.78% similarity. These characteristics of the isolated strains jointly with the production process of mozzarella cheese has allowed to hypothesise an environmental contamination.

Italian Journal of Food Safety 2014; colume 3:1708

Agrihood? It’s a real thing, but make safety a priority

When we moved into our new townhome in the concrete jungle of inner Brisbane, I suggested fruit trees and berries instead of pretty plants that do nothing.

I was shot down.

At least my strip of concrete balcony has lemon and lime trees, a variety of berries, and agrihoodveggies. We would starve if we had to depend on my plants for sustenance.

Because farming is hard.

But I like the concept of an agrihood which, according to the N.Y. Times, is a residential development where a working farm is the central feature, in the same way that other communities may cluster around a golf course, pool or fitness center.

At least a dozen projects across the country are thriving, enlisting thousands of home buyers who crave access to open space, verdant fields and fresh food.

“I hear from developers all the time about this,” said Ed McMahon, a senior fellow for sustainable development at the Urban Land Institute, a nonprofit real estate research group in Washington, D. C. “They’ve figured out that unlike a golf course, which costs millions to build and millions to maintain, they can provide green space that actually earns a profit.” Not to mention a potential tax break for preserving agricultural land.

In Agritopia, near Phoenix, fences gripped by grapevines and blackberry bushes separate the farm from the community’s 452 single-family homes, each with a wide front porch and sidewalks close enough to encourage conversation. A 117-unit assisted- and independent-living center is set to open this summer.

The hub of neighborhood life is a small square overlooking the farm, with a coffeehouse, farm-to-table restaurant and honor-system farm stand. The square is also where residents line up on Wednesday evenings to claim their bulging boxes of just-harvested produce, eggs and honey, which come with a $100-a-month membership in the community-supported agriculture, or C.S.A., program. Neighbors trade recipes and gossip, and on the way home can pick up dinner from one of a few food trucks stocked by the farm.

The Times story glosses over the realities of farming and the safety aspects, but the idea of an agrihood – even if apparently appropriated by white folks — has merit.

Better zoonoses surveillance needed in Nepal

A team of scientists from Belgium, Nepal, New Zealand, Switzerland and the Netherlands report in a study titled ‘The Burden of Parasitic Zoonoses in Nepal: A Systematic Review’ that the country needs a better surveillance system to accurately estimate animal-borne parasitic disease or ‘parasitic zoonoses (PZs)’.

The recent study estimates the public health burden of PZs in Nepal at 24,000 healthy pork tapewormsyears lost annually.

Neurocysticercosis caused by pork tapeworms affect the nervous system, cystic echinococcosis traced through dog tapeworms and congenital toxoplasmosis in which mothers infected with the toxoplasma parasite give birth to infected children, are the three top PZs in Nepal, according to the study.

The study estimates that Nepal loses 14,268 healthy years annually due to neurocysticercosis, 9,255 years due to congenital toxoplasmosis, and 251 due to cystic echinococcosis. Numerous data sources were analysed in the study to examine the relevance and importance of such infections.

“Nepal is considered endemic for at least 10 PZs, and might be endemic for seven others. Most of these diseases probably only have a small public health impact. However, neurocysticercosis and congenital toxoplasmosis are likely to impose an important burden to public health,” said the report.

Docs say, steer clear of roadside food in India

Eating a plate of pani puri from your street-corner bhaiya, or a plate of cold fruit salad to beat the heat may not be such a good idea this season as a host of gastrointestinal and pani.puristomach infections are already making the rounds in Bangalore.

Viruses, bacteria and other microorganisms might just be lurking in those tasty concoctions that we all feel so tempted to get our hands on, and if infected, you may have to make several trips to doctors as acute gastroenteritis (GE) could get you.

Widespread food fraud in UK county

Widespread contraventions of food labelling law were found in a nine-month programme of meat product testing carried out by Leicester City Council, but no food safety concerns were raised.

The council launched the city-wide programme in May last year in response to the horsemeat scandal, when lamb burgers labelled as halal, and supplied to a city primary food.fraud.adulterationschool, were found to contain pork DNA.

One-hundred-and-five meat products were tested from local businesses. Of these, 47 samples were found to contain meat from species other than that declared, and at levels regarded as gross contamination, said the council.

Last month a West Yorkshire public laboratory published findings from a six-month study, showing that 38% of food products, including meat, were mislabelled or had compositional faults.

FDA closes cheese plant linked to listeriosis illnesses and death

The investigation into seven illnesses and a death linked to Hispanic cheese has resulted in suspended operations at a Delaware plant, Roos Foods. According to the Associated Press, FDA inspectors found a mess including poor sanitation and practices.roos-foods-logo
This is only the second time the FDA has used its authority to shut down a plant after gaining that authority in a 2011 food safety law. The agency said Tuesday that its inspectors found unsanitary conditions at Roos Foods in Kenton, Del., including a badly leaking roof, rusting and deteriorating equipment and food residues on equipment even after it had been cleaned.
The FDA said the agency took the action because food manufactured by the company could cause “serious adverse health consequences or death to humans.”
Roos can request a hearing on the decision, and the FDA can restart operations if the agency determines the health threat has been rectified. Calls to Roos Foods on Tuesday seeking comment were not returned.
The company has already recalled a large variety of its products, including many cheeses in its Amigo, Anita, Mexicana, and Santa Rosa de Lima brands. 
Who was buying cheese from this place and did they send anyone out to see what was going on?

No: Is hot water more effective for washing hands?

 

We’ve written about this before, but here is another take on the effectiveness of warm or hot water in handwashing.

Researchers surveyed 510 adults and asked them questions about their hand washing behaviours and perceptions.  People were asked how often they wash their hands, for handwashing.sep.12how long and how hot the water should be.

According to the published report, “70% of respondents said they believe that using hot water is more effective than warm, room temperature, or cold water, despite a lack of evidence to back that up.  The research showed a, “strong cognitive connection between water temperature and hygiene in both the United States and Western Europe.” 

So while many believe hot water is more effective for hand washing the study actually concluded, “the temperature of water used is not related to how well pathogens are eliminated during the process.”  Additionally, warmer water can irritate the skin and can affect its protective layer, which may cause it to be less resistant to bacteria.  Skin irritation has been reported as  one of the main reasons many healthcare workers forgo hand hygiene for example.

 Interestingly if you look at the official guidelines for hand washing from the CDC and WHO, both do not actually specify a water temperature.  They do recommend using soap and water and scrubbing using proper technique for at least 20-seconds, followed by drying hands thoroughly.

Despite this there is still lots of confusion as some public health organizations still recommend, “elevated water temperature.”  The FDA Food Code for example, which is a model used to enforce health standards in restaurants recommends the , “hand washing sink be equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least 100°F or 38°C.”

One subscriber to this blog recently commented, “I have come across a food safety consultant who insisted that the temperature should be 60°C (140°F).  Observations revealed that staff proceeded to use cold water saying hot water was too hot!  Microbiological swabbing of hands revealed an increase in Campylobacter, E.coli and Listeria counts on hands that were washed in basins when very hot water was demanded by the consultant, compared to hands exposed to water at 40 to 45 °C.”

Barry Michaels, a microbiologist and expert in infectious disease performed the only known comprehensive review of published recommendations or testing standards  on hand washing and rinsing water temperatures from 1938 to 2002.   He found that there was no consensus but instead temperatures ranged from ambient  to “as hot as you can stand” or “as hot as possible”.  Many recommendations in food and healthcare environments were not concerned with the water temperature at all, while an equal number only specified that water in the lukewarm to warm temperature regions be used.  Then there was a select group including ASTM test methods, American Society of Microbiology, the FDA Food Code  and  experts in food and healthcare who felt that hot jon.stewart.handwashing.2002water from 40 to 50 degrees °C (~100-120 degrees °F) should be used.  Reasoning was that hot water was needed to melt fats in food soils and increase antimicrobial effectiveness.  In testing on efficacy and skin health Barry Michaels and team found that hot water should not be used.

Michaels commented, “The damage at 60°C would probably be enough to stop workers from washing hands all together.  Results indicate that water temperature has only slight effect on transient or resident bacterial reduction during normal hand washing when bland soap is used.  We have also tested with four other soap products each having different active ingredients (PCMX, lodophor, Quat & Triclosan) and overall, the four soap products produced similar efficacy results”.

“Although there were slight increases in Log10 reductions (ascribed to antimicrobial speed of chemical reaction), skin moisture content decreased while Visiometer skin dryness score and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) increased at higher temperatures. Results were not statistically significant for any parameter, but all trends were unmistakable.”

“In summation, water temperature should be comfortable to allow or encourage frequent hand washing with mild, but effective soaps (designed for soils to be encountered).  Vigorous hand washing is the preferred method.  In terms of ideal temperature, I would say from ~70 to 105 °F or ~20 to 40.5 °C.  This is comfortable without the risk of skin damage,” concluded Michaels.

Reference for the research cited is: Michaels, B.; Gangar, V.; Schultz, A.; Arenas, M.; Curiale, M.; Ayers, T.; Paulson, D.  Water Temperature as a Factor in Handwashing Efficacy.  Food Service Technology 2002; 2:139-149.
)