You see a cute lizard, I see a Salmonella factory

We got two kittens from a rescue shelter. The 4-year-old and the 38-year-old are both enjoying the frantics of kittens. Even me.

And it allowed me to continue the discussion with Sorenne about bacteria and germs, and why sucking on her foot isn’t a great idea, and how kitties skink.blue.tongueclean themselves.

But there will be no reptiles in this house, except for the occasional small skink that enters by accident.

Parents and schools see cute pets; I see Salmonella factories.

Scott Weese of the University of Guelph chimes in with his recent Worms and Germs blog post, excerpts below:

Reptiles can be good pets in some situations. The key is understanding and accepting the risk. That involves understanding the risks associated with reptiles, understanding types of households where the risk is high and knowing what to do to reduce the risk.

Denial isn’t an effective infection control measure.

An interview in Oregon Live with the founder of International Reptile Rescue highlights this issue.

“And while reptiles have been associated with spreading salmonella (the CDC reports about 70,000 such cases a year) people are more likely to black kittycontract it from a dog, Hart says”

Uh…no. Reptiles are clearly high risk when it comes to Salmonella. Reptile contact has been clearly and repeatedly shown to be a risk factor for human salmonellosis. Dogs and cats (and various other animals) are potential sources of salmonellosis but while many more people have contact with dogs and cats, reptile contact is much more likely to result in Salmonella transmission. It only makes sense. Reptiles are at very high risk for shedding the bacterium. Dogs and cats rarely do (especially when they’re not fed raw meat).

“She’s never seen a case in the 30-plus years she’s been working with reptiles.”

Ok. So, since I’ve never actually seen influenza virus, I’ll never get the flu?

I know a lot of infectious disease physicians that have different experiences. In fact, it’s rare for me to talk to an infectious diseases physician without them providing details of various reptile-associated salmonellosis cases.

Talking about the risk of Salmonella shouldn’t be taken as insulting or a threat to reptile enthusiasts. People should accept that the risk is present and try to minimize it. The article actually has some of that useful information. “Just use common sense – wash hands thoroughly after handling the animal or its cage. A good rule of thumb is to keep hand sanitizer nearby. While white kittychildren under age 5 should avoid any contact with reptiles, Hart doesn’t advise snakes for children under age 7 or 8 for fear they could unwittingly harm the creature.”

Reducing the risk is common sense…keeping reptiles out of high risk environments and using basic hygiene and infection control practices.

However, any semblance of common sense goes out the door when a rescue like this offers programs where you can pay them to bring reptiles to daycares, pre-schools and schools. So much for young kids avoiding contact with reptiles.

Reptiles aren’t bad, they’re just bad in certain situations. Common sense needs to be more common.

This entry was posted in Food Safety Policy, Salmonella and tagged , , , by Douglas Powell. Bookmark the permalink.

About Douglas Powell

A former professor of food safety and the publisher of barfblog.com, Powell is passionate about food, has five daughters, and is an OK goaltender in pickup hockey. Download Doug’s CV here. Dr. Douglas Powell editor, barfblog.com retired professor, food safety 3/289 Annerley Rd Annerley, Queensland 4103 dpowell29@gmail.com 61478222221 I am based in Brisbane, Australia, 15 hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time