Groundhog Day, Alaska Campylobacter-in-raw-milk version

Folks in Alaska must be undergoing their own kind of public health Groundhog Day – where the same day is relived with slight variations.

But unlike the Bill Murray movie, no matter how much the health types cajole, persuade, and act nice, things won’t change.

Ask Hugh Pennington.

Just days after a report implicated raw milk as the cause of 31 cases of campylobacteriosis, including four cases of reactive arthritis, in early 2013, bill.murray.groundhog.day_.storyAlaskan health profesionals had a paper published in the Journal of Food Protection documenting a 2011 outbreak of Campylobacter linked to … raw milk.

Snappy title, though: Sharing milk but not messages: Campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of raw milk from a cow-share program in Alaska, 2011.

Abstract below.

Alaska public and environmental health authorities investigated a cluster of campylobacteriosis cases among people who had consumed raw, unpasteurized milk obtained from a cow-share program in Alaska. Although raw milk is not permitted by law to be offered commercially, consumers can enter into cow-share agreements whereby they contribute funds for the upkeep of cows and in turn receive a share of the milk for their personal use. Laboratory testing of stool specimens collected from ill persons and from cows on the farm revealed an indistinguishable strain of Campylobacter. In this outbreak, numerous confirmed and suspected cases were not among cow shareholders; therefore, these individuals had not been advised of the potential health hazards associated with consumption of raw milk nor were they informed of the outbreak developments.

Journal of Food Protection®, Number 5, May 2013, pp. 744-918 , pp. 744-747(4)

Castrodale, L.J.; Gerlach, R.F.; Xavier, C.M.; Smith, B.J.; Cooper, M.P.; McLaughlin, J.B.

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iafp/jfp/2013/00000076/00000005/art00001

31 sick, 4 develop reactive arthritis; Campylobacter from raw milk, Alaska, Jan–Feb 2013

As noted in that World Health Organization report, the major sequelae of Campylobacteriosis are Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), reactive arthritis (ReA) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

GBS is a severe disease, requiring intensive care in some 20% of cases; case-fatality rates in high-income countries are between 3 and 10%. Globally, santa.barf.sprout.raw.milkapproximately one-third of GBS cases have been attributed to Campylobacter infection.

While it is difficult to determine the true extent of ReA, because of a lack of clear diagnostic and classification criteria, studies suggest that it occurs in 1–5% of those infected with Campylobacter. It has been estimated that 25% of ReA cases may go on to chronic spondyloarthropathy.

That’s exactly what happened in the Campylobacter-from-raw-milk outbreak in Alaska earlier this year.

On February 13, 2013, Alaska State Public Health Laboratory (ASPHL) notified the Alaska Section of Epidemiology (SOE) of a cluster of four C. coli isolates with an indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern that was new to Alaska. All four isolates were grown from stool specimens collected in late January from ill Kenai Peninsula residents.

Patient interviews and other investigative work indicated that all four of the ill persons with PFGE-matching C. coli strains reported consuming raw (unpasteurized) milk within a few days of their illness onset. These initial interviews also led to additional case finding, primarily by way of ill persons reporting others they knew who were also ill with similar symptoms. While some of the persons napoleon milkwho were initially identified during this investigation were reluctant to say where their raw milk came from, four individuals reported that it came from Farm A, a cow-share farm on the Kenai Peninsula.

A confirmed case was defined as a laboratory-confirmed, PFGE-matched, C. coli infection diagnosed from January 1, 2013 onward. A clinical case was defined as an acute GI illness with self-reported diarrhea lasting ≥2 days in a person with exposure to Farm A raw milk within 10 days of illness onset. A secondary case was defined as an acute GI illness lasting ≥2 days in a person with close contact to a confirmed or clinical case within 10 days of illness onset.

On February 14, SOE notified the Office of the State Veterinarian (OSV) of the outbreak, and a joint press release and health advisory were issued on February 15.2 OSV immediately notified Farm A of the outbreak and requested a list of all active shareholders. Despite notification of the outbreak, Farm A continued to distribute raw milk to shareholders living in the Kenai Peninsula and in Anchorage.

During the week of February 18, two additional confirmed cases were reported—one of which was in a school-aged child who was hospitalized for 4 days with fevers, abdominal pain, rash, and acute reactive arthritis involving the wrists, ankles, knees, and hips. On February 22, an updated health advisory describing new developments in the outbreak was issued.3 On February 22, Farm A provided SOE with an incomplete shareholder list, which lacked contact information for the majority of shareholders. Calls were made to notify persons on the list about the outbreak and to identify additional cases.

In total, 31 cases were identified during the investigation. Ill persons ranged in age from 7 months to 72 years (median: 10 years). Three children and one adult developed reactive arthritis lasting a minimum of 6 weeks. Two persons were colbert.raw.milkhospitalized. All ill persons were Kenai Peninsula residents who either personally consumed Farm A raw milk within 10 days of illness onset (n=29) or met the secondary case definition (n=2).

Environmental Investigation

On February 22, OSV and SOE toured Farm A and collected cow feces, milk, and other environmental samples. Steps where the milk could be contaminated (from collection to bottling) were reviewed with the farmer, and the inherent risk of bacterial contamination of unpasteurized milk was discussed. The outbreak strain of C. coli was not isolated from the samples collected at the farm that day; however, three different strains of C. jejuni were isolated from cow manure, and Listeria monocytogenes grew from a raw milk sample.

This large outbreak of C. coli infection on the Kenai Peninsula was caused by consumption of Farm A raw milk. While this outbreak appears to be over, additional campylobacteriosis cases could still be identified at any time as Campylobacter species were identified from Farm A manure during the environmental investigation. Furthermore, this is the second outbreak of campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of raw milk distributed by an Alaskan cow-share operation in the past 2 years. These outbreaks are an unfortunate reminder of the inherent risks associated with raw milk consumption, and underscore the importance of pasteurization.

It is not surprising that the C. coli outbreak strain was not isolated from the environmental samples, as Campylobacter bacteria are difficult to isolate from the environment, they are shed intermittently in cow manure, and the farm visit occurred weeks after the outbreak peaked. Incidentally, L. monocytogenes—a bacteria that can cause life-threatening meningitis—was isolated from Farm A milk; no listeriosis cases were reported during the outbreak.

Finally, four (13%) ill persons developed reactive arthritis, a painful form of inflammatory arthritis that sometimes occurs in reaction to a bacterial infection and can persist for up to 12 months. These cases underscore the fact that Campylobacter infection can lead to prolonged adverse health consequences.

WHO: the global view of Campylobacteriosis

From July 9-11, 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO), in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), convened an Expert Consultation on The Global View of Campylobacteriosis, in Utrecht, Netherlands.

Below are the general conclusions:

 Considerable new evidence, data, and analytical tools have emerged in the ten chicken.campy.vaccineyears since the previous WHO consultations on Campylobacter.

 In terms of public health actions, there is already a sufficient evidence base to address the burden of disease from C. jejuni and C. coli. The importance of other species in terms of burden of disease is still unclear, but is considered unlikely to eclipse these two species.

 Public health surveillance can provide important basic information to policy-makers about the frequency of infection, who is affected, and the success of specific prevention strategies. Surveillance is the starting point for studies of burden of disease and source attribution.

 There is a need for standardization and validation of laboratory methods.

 Burden of disease studies provide the evidence base that drives the need for control measures across all outcomes of Campylobacteriosis while taking into consideration its underestimation.

 There is considerable potential for the identification of new sequelae from acute infection. However, decision criteria are needed on the level of evidence required to add outcomes to burden estimates. This applies to all sequelae, and may increase burden estimates considerably.

 In order to reduce exposure countries should be encouraged to adopt the recently developed Codex Guidelines for the Control of Campylobacter and Salmonella in chicken meat which promote a risk based approach to the management of Campylobacter in chicken meat traded internationally. campy.who.jul.12Consideration should be given to the development of additional guidance and recommendations for the management of Campylobacter in other potential food vehicles that are traded internationally.

 Source attribution studies should adopt a holistic attitude, considering multiple sources and pathways of exposure. Where possible attribution estimates should combine both molecular tying and epidemiological data and include measures of uncertainty.

 Although poultry is the dominant source of infection in many countries, controlling Campylobacter in poultry meat will not completely eliminate the disease in humans. Options are available to control other pathways which are based on general hygiene, generic control measures including biosecurity and sanitation.

 Reducing the load of Campylobacter in poultry to a level with a low probability of causing illness is unlikely to be achieved by any single pre-harvest or post-harvest intervention. Success will most likely occur through use of multiple stepwise interventions to lower the load of Campylobacter on or in each bird on the farm and in the processing facility.

 The epidemiology of Campylobacteriosis is likely to be different in high-income countries versus LMIC. This will affect control options.

 GFN, as an international training and capacity development network, will play a key role in promoting better and more consistent methodologies and quality assurance for work with Campylobacter. Where possible, GFN should link with other international networks, such as FERG, which is promoting capacity development in estimation of burden of foodborne disease.

The complete report is available at https://extranet.who.int/iris/restricted/bitstream/10665/80751/1/9789241564601_eng.pdf.

Surveys still suck: UK attitudes to slaughterhouse treatments

The piping hot risk communicators at the UK Food Standards Agency have found that rapid chilling of meat and the application of hot water or steam emerged as the two slaughterhouse treatments consumers would find most acceptable.

Treatments using lactic acid and ozone were initially considered less acceptable, however, when consumers were given extra information communicationon lactic acid, its acceptability increased significantly.

The survey was carried out as part of the Agency’s work to reduce the levels of campylobacter on raw poultry.

FSA Head Of Foodborne Diseases Strategy, Bob Martin said, ‘The findings suggest that providing clear information about the treatments, such as what they are and how they work, would have a positive impact on the public’s acceptability of new treatments such as these.’

FSA chief scientist Andrew Wadge also weighed in, writing the results suggest that “public resistance to innovative ideas may be partly due to an unfamiliarity with particular processes.

“It seems then, that the language we use and the type of information we provide on innovative processes is important to public acceptance of science.”

Uh-huh.

5 sick; help animals on Isle of Man, get Campylobacter

About five cases of Cryptosporidium and Campylobacter have been reported on the island during the past three months.

It is thought some of those affected may have been involved in helping snow-cow_1216616ifarmers to rescue livestock after heavy snow last month.

Food Safety Manager Ivan Bratty told BBC that  simple precautions must be taken.

“These recent cases serve as a timely reminder of the importance of thorough hand washing after handling livestock and before preparing or handling food to prevent infection and the spread of disease in the community,” he said.

“It is also important for anyone suffering from diarrhoea to avoid swimming pools as Cryptosporidium can survive in chlorinated water.”

Food safety is never simple.

Puppy ban after 15 sickened by Campylobacter in Aust. aged care facility

Health officials have recommended puppies be banned from aged care facilities after two outbreaks of Campylobacter gastroenteritis in a Canberra nursing home.

But trained adult dogs will still be able to visit aged care homes.

The Age reports a paper to be presented at a Communicable Diseases Conference in Canberra on Tuesday will outline how15 people were dog_vomitinfected during two separate gastroenteritis outbreaks in the nursing home between April and June last year.

A healthy four-month-old puppy was identified as the likely cause of the outbreaks and excluded from the facility.

”Campylobacter jejuni was recovered from both human and canine faecal samples,” the study findings said.

”A review of published literature showed puppies extensively shed Campylobacter species.

”The [aged care] setting and low infective dose also made transmission likely, despite the varying degrees of contact between the puppy and cases.

”While infection control practices were generally appropriate, the facility’s animal policy did not adequately address potential zoonotic risk.”

21 now sick; Campylobacter outbreak traced to Alaskan raw milk

The state health department has traced the source of the campylobacter outbreak that has infected now more than 21 people back to Peninsula Dairy, a dairy farm in Kasilof on the Kenai Peninsula; two people have been hospitalized.

The farm operates a cow-share program. The milk is distributed to shareholders throughout the Kenai Peninsula, in Anchorage, and in Sitka. There is at least one colbert.raw.milksecondary case of an infant who became ill after having close contact with a laboratory-confirmed case.

The Peninsula Clarion reports tate veterinarian Bob Gerlach and Donna Fearey, a nurse epidemiologist for the state, on Tuesday inspected Peninsula Dairy, owned by Kevin Byers. Gerlach said they saw no problems with Byers’ operation.

“In comparison to most dairies, he’s doing a very pretty good job,” Gerlach said.

He said Byers had modern and clean equipment and his cows were healthy and well-fed.

In a 2011 outbreak, 18 people were stricken with Campylobacter that was eventually traced back to a farm owned by Byers’ brother in the Matanuska Valley.

The campylobacter infection was of a different strain, however, and Gerlach said connecting the two outbreaks would be inappropriate.

The department cannot close Byers’ farm as cow-share programs are legal, McLaughlin said. The direct sale of raw milk is, however, illegal, he said.

Fancy food ain’t safe food: £72,000 fine for UK hotel

Add 5-star Frimley Hall Hotel to the embarrassingly long list of fancy-pants eateries that don’t know how to cook chicken to inactivate Campylobacter.

According to Camberley People, dozens of diners celebrating the marriage of a Mr and Mrs Dunsford fell ill after eating a contaminated Frimley Hall Hotelchicken liver parfait, served up at on May 28, 2011.

Now its operators have been ordered to pay a £72,000 fine and costs for the food safety breaches.

Macdonald Frimley Hall pleaded guilty on February 12 to two charges including serving the contaminated chicken dish.

The second charge related to a failure to identify potential food safety hazards that could arise from the parfait so that steps can be taken to reduce or eliminate risk.

Tim Pashen, the council’s executive head of community, said, “In this case, the parfait had been cooked at too low a heat and there was no recording system in place to check how long it had been held at the necessary temperature. The recipe was new to the hotel and no regard had been given to clear and publicised warnings from the Food Standards Agency concerning the need to undertake rigorous checks.”

The judge commented that the failures had resulted in an ‘entirely foreseeable outcome’. 

A Macdonald Hotels spokesman said: “Despite its five star food rating and its on-going due diligence the company would like to apologise for any distress that was caused to guests attending the function in question.”

4 sick; Campylobacter linked to raw milk in Alaska outbreak

alaskapublic.org reports the Alaska State Department of Health is investigating an outbreak of a foodborne illness linked to raw milk. Officials have confirmed four cases of Campylobacter infection in people who drank raw milk on the Kenai Peninsula.

Dr. Brian Yablon is a medical epidemiologist with the state. He says the cases colbert.raw.milkhave all been identified by the state lab in the last three weeks:

“When they looked at these strains, they found that the four specimens were all exactly the same type, so that is consistent with a cluster of illnesses and when we found out additional information it seemed that all of the people who developed the infection had consumed raw milk or unpasteurized milk in the proceeding several days before they got sick,” Yablon said.

The state is still working to identify the source of the raw milk. A farmer named Kevin Byers in Kasilof distributes raw milk to families around the state. He did not agree to a recorded interview, but said he doesn’t know if his milk is responsible for the outbreak. He says his customers drink his milk for the perceived health benefits. According to a recent newspaper article, Byers has 150 customers as far away as Sitka.

Selling raw milk is illegal in Alaska. But farmers have found ways to do it legally.

A similar outbreak of Campylobacter bacteria was traced to a Mat-Su Valley farmer in 2011. There were 18 people with probable or confirmed illness in that outbreak. That operation has since gone out of business.

Mudguards reduce barfing in cycling events

Amy and I brought a couple of U.S. bicycles with us – and a bag full of skates and kid’s hockey equipment – when we returned to Brisbane.

We may be biking more, but won’t be entering any off-road races (that’s Amy on her previous bike, left, in Kansas, and below, right, today, both not exactly as shown).

Those who do, know there have been race-related outbreaks of Campylobacter and other bugs throughout the world, probably due to biking wizozwiththrough mud and crap on paths that may have been used by livestock or contaminated via runoff.

Mud guards apparently work.

Norwegian researchers report in Epidemiol. Infect. (2013), 141, 517–523, that in 2009, following a bike race, a gastrointestinal illness outbreak affected many participants.

A cohort study showed an attack rate of 16.3% with the main risk factor being mud splashes to the face. Considering these findings, in 2010 recommendations to participants in the bike race were issued and environmental control measures were implemented. In 2010, a retrospective cohort study using web-based questionnaires was conducted to measure the use of preventive measures and to assess risk factors associated with gastrointestinal illness. A 69% response rate was achieved and 11721 records Eva Sizzles for Bebe Sportanalysed, with 572 (attack rate 4.9%) matching the case definition, i.e. participants reporting diarrhoea within 10 days of race. There was a clear increase in the use of mudguards (96.7% reported access to/receiving information on preventive measures) and a significant decrease in gastrointestinal illness. This may indicate that the measures have been effective and should be considered, both in terms of environmental control measures as well as individual measures.