Food Safety Policy

  • Posted: March 13th, 2010 - 2:36pm by Doug Powell

    Introducing the Foodscan 3000, which is way better than the Foodscan 2000 -- or at least by a thousand -- and completely blows away the Foodscan 1814.

    According to a press release from the Israeli-based company, “MS Food Safety is currently developing the FOODSCAN 3000, a hand-held and portable food contamination detector. The development program of the FOODSCAN 3000 addresses the current gaps in food safety & product inspection. It uses the most advanced scientific and technological approach to identify potential foodborne illnesses ahead of time. This helps protecting consumers from unintentional or deliberate contamination.”

    Any company going by MS Food Safety is suspect; a company called PhD Food Safety would be much more credible.

    “You need to have an instrument by your beside that can detect the food contaminants real-time without the need to rely on the lengthy and costly lab analysis process. The FOODSCAN 3000 is the only hand-held and portable food contamination detector than can detect the contamination caused by common pathogens such as Salmonella, E.coli O157:H7, Listeria and others.”

    You bet I want an instrument by my beside.

    As one notable food safety type said,

    “The company should be sued for false advertising.”

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 11th, 2010 - 3:15pm by Doug Powell

    Sorenne and I only got through the start of The Colbert Report this morning before it was off to vaccinations, so this post is somewhat late.

    But Stefan did take an excellent shot at more food wackiness being peddled on the Internet and insisted on his home herb garden, because, “I refuse to live in a world where I can’t garnish.”

    My seeds are germinating in the Kansas spring, including my garnish garden, but I get my seeds at Home Depot or several other places. I want hybrids. Genetic modification is good. That’s why hybrid corn has been around since the early 1900s.

    Not so for the Survival Seed Bank, which says it’s more valuable than silver or gold in a real meltdown.

    Remember, our hand-picked seeds are not genetically modified in any way. You simply save some of your harvest seeds from year one and have more than enough to plant in year two. You'll never need to buy seeds again! You just can't do that with man-made hybrid seeds.

    Most seed companies are now selling only "terminator" seeds which have been genetically modified and will not reproduce themselves.

    This is nonsense. And for government-paranoias here in the Midwest,

    "Indestructible Survival Seed Bank Can Be Buried To Avoid Confiscation."

    It’s all BS to make a buck.

     

    The Colbert Report Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
    Survival Seed Bank
    www.colbertnation.com
    Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor Skate Expectations
    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Policy  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: March 9th, 2010 - 3:17pm by Doug Powell

    I was out with the family picking up some Chinese and wine last night and a woman waiting for her take-out said, “Oh, I’m glad to know you eat here.”

    “Not usually, but it’s Chinese so everything’s cooked.”

    She then introduced herself as a veterinary student at Kansas State University who’d seen me lecture a few weeks ago. And then she asked me if I’d seen the story about the fake U.S. Department of Agriculture veterinarian.

    I said, “Slipped my mind.”

    I don’t see everything so if barfblogcom readers see anything of interest, please send along.

    The student did, and it concerns a story that aired in Feb. 2010 in Atlanta.

    WSB TV reported that a man used fraudulent credentials to land a job as a veterinarian with the U.S. Department of Agriculture where he worked in Atlanta-based food safety and inspection service for the past four years.

    I don’t know how much of this is true or why the story didn’t get much national play – so judge for yourselves.

    http://www.wsbtv.com/video/22526579/

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 8th, 2010 - 11:19am by Doug Powell

    For the past week, people in Kansas have been asking me, did you love the Canadian men’s Olympic hockey victory?

    I say, just glad it was a good game, great for hockey.

    And then I say, the women’s hockey team really rocked.

    Most people look at me and say, women play hockey?

    The Canadian women defeated the U.S. for Olympic gold, 2-0, and then showed the men how to party.

    I coached girls’ hockey for a number of years while my kids were growing up. To coach little girls playing ice hockey in Canada requires 16 hours of training. To coach kids on a travel team requires an additional 24 hours of training.

    It seems reasonable to have some minimal training for those who prepare food for public consumption.

    Not so in North Dakota, where the State Health Department says it will not seek charges against a rural Washburn woman for operating an unlicensed catering business linked to sickening 180 people last summer.

    Aggie Jennings catered three separate events in June -- two wedding receptions and a family reunion -- that resulted in 76 people seeking medical attention with 10 hospitalized for salmonella Montevideo food poisoning.

    A subsequent report found a total of 180 people met the case definition for Salmonella Montevideo.

    The Bismark Tribune explains enforcement of regulations governing caterers falls under the jurisdiction of local health units.

    Lisa Clute, executive officer for the First District Health Unit, said that board met Feb. 18 and voted not to recommend charges against Jennings, which would be Class B misdemeanors.

    The strain of salmonella is one commonly associated with baby chickens, which Jennings raised on her rural residence.

    The health department issued an order to Jennings to stop catering June 17, three days prior to the McClusky event, the report said.

    The report also found there were four dishes that tested positive for salmonella and all had some type of preparation, storage or handling at Jennings' residence.

    It said several people assisting in food preparation at her home may have provided a source of cross contamination.

    Clute said the First District Health Unit wants to be consistent in how it deals with such cases and in this instance, she thinks it has.

    "We are confident she will never do this again. We stopped it quickly and efficiently and at this point there is no public health threat.”

    These people wouldn’t be allowed to sit on the bench and open the door at a little girls’ hockey game. I don’t want them to make food either.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 6th, 2010 - 2:37pm by Doug Powell

    U. S. Customs and Border Protection officers stopped more than 100 pounds of soft Mexican cheese or queso fresco, hidden in false compartments of a vehicle trying to enter the United States across the Bridge of the Americas on Wednesday.

    Associated Press notes federal officials permit travelers to import personal quantities of cheese — about 11 pounds per person.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 4th, 2010 - 5:36pm by Doug Powell

    There’s this Joint Institute for Food Safety and Nutrition at the University of Maryland where U.S. Food and Drug Admin. types go to be trained in all matters related to food risk.

    A few years ago, I shook hands with one of the directors and said, sure, I’ll help you out on risk communication stuff, cause he said they sorta sucked at it.

    I never heard back, despite several e-mails.

    And they still suck at it.

    JIFSAN’s spring symposium is, Risk Communication - Communicating Science to the Public.

    Risk communication 101: talk with people, not to them. If any of you had kids you would know this.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 4th, 2010 - 7:30am by Doug Powell

    When people ask if I speak other languages, I say, sure, I speak Canadian and American.

    But from my WASPy roots I’ve grown to appreciate the role different languages have in making a global citizen. I took the lazy solution and travel with someone who knows languages.

    In Dubai, more than 60 per cent of food workers in the capital who took hygiene training courses last year failed them, many because of language barriers.

    Sure, most food safety training sucks, trying to make HACCP experts or microbiology geeks out of line cooks, but language can be a huge barrier. That’s why we have food safety infosheets in French, Spanish and Portuguese. We can do a bunch of other languages if someone wants them.

    Stephen Pakenham-Walsh, a food-service consultant based in Abu Dhabi said relying on English was “short-sighted” on the part of food tutors.

    Indians make up 65 per cent of the food industry workforce. Other Asian nationalities comprise 20 per cent of workers, with Arabs making up 12 per cent. The results indicate that the large majority of workers are not getting effective hygiene training.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 4th, 2010 - 6:57am by Doug Powell

    Today’s The USA Today (I never tire of using that) reports that Dean Wyatt, a supervisory veterinarian at the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service will tell a congressional hearing today that USDA superiors failed to act on reports of illegal and unsafe slaughterhouse practices, letting suspect operations continue despite public health risks.

    The story says Wyatt will detail instances in which he and other inspectors were overruled when citing slaughterhouses for violations such as shocking and butchering days-old calves that were too weak or sick to stand. He also describes being threatened with transfer or demotion after citing a plant for butchering conscious pigs, despite rules that they first be stunned and unconscious.

    In 2008 and early 2009, Wyatt ordered suspensions in operations three times at Bushway Packing Inc., in Grand Isle, VT. Among other things, he found downed calves being dragged through pens to slaughter — a violation because contact with excrement can contaminate animals. In each case, he says, managers overruled him and allowed the plant to keep running.

    Bushway subsequently made headlines last fall when the Humane Society of the United States filmed undercover video of workers hitting and using electric prods to move calves. The plant was shut down.

    CBS Radio called about 5 a.m. for comment – they’re so polite, they always e-mail first to see if I’m awake so they don’t wake the household. As soon as I said, yeah, let’s do it, 1-year-old Sorenne awoke so I missed the first call to change a diaper and provide 8 ounces of milk. But, the reporter at CBS in N.Y. agreed it was a good call, kid first, then radio soundbites, in which I said something along the lines of, I don’t know anything about the specifics of these cases, but the best slaughterhouses won’t be held hostage by a dude with a video camera, and will get way, way out in front of the minimal standards required by USDA. Maybe it’s too early and I’m still dreaming.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 3rd, 2010 - 2:17pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    At the start of pretty much every talk I’ve given in the past 3 years I have a slide about the societal cost and estimated burden of foodborne illness. I somewhat robotically spout out these two statistics:

    - About 1-in 3 to 1-in-4 individuals will acquire illnesses from food each year
    - The societal burden of these illnesses is estimated to be $1.4 trillion

    The statistics I use come from a variety of sources including USDA Economic Research Service, WHO, CDC, Canadian health officials and Australian public health.

    Today I woke up to a press release from the Produce Safety Coalition, the Make our Food Safe Coalition and the Pew Charitable Trust that cited a “landmark  study” estimating the cost of foodborne illness to be $152 billion annually.


    From the report:
    There are a number of ways to estimate the economic impact of foodborne illness. This report uses an FDA cost-estimate approach: health-related costs are the sum of medical costs (physician services, pharmaceuticals, and hospital costs) and losses to quality of life (lost life expectancy, pain and suffering, and functional disability).

    Hardly landmark, unless you mean this estimate represents  a reduction of almost a factor of 10 in estimated costs since 2007 (I don’t think that was what was intended). Tanya Roberts published a paper in 2007 estimating the cost of foodborne illness from a willingness-to-pay (WTP) standpoint at $1.4 trillion. According to Roberts, WTP is endorsed in the literature as the valuation method most consistent with economic theory and her calculation included all seventy-six million cases of acute food-borne illness. Previous estimates examined only a few specific pathogens.

    Sure, the numbers matter when it comes to prioritizing the need to address or fund food safety work. Whether it’s $6 billion, $152 billion, $1.4 trillion or $2,500-$8,000 per case (pathogen dependant) it’s a huge number. But it’s also very abstract.

    The statistics are nice, but they really don’t grab foodhandlers’ attention. More compelling is where the real cost of foodborne illness is born: with the individuals and in the families of those who have been affected by it. Billions and trillions are fodder for discussions with politicians and boards of directors. Where the real food safety work occurs, both positive and negative, is on the farm, in the restaurant kitchen, supermarket deli and homes. And the numbers don’t really matter there, what resonates is that foodborne illness sucks.

    What matters so much more to individual food handlers who protect public health in the US are the stories of real people being affected by food they trusted would not make them ill.

    The disconnect between statistics and stories is why I follow up the burden slide with more impactful tales of outbreaks that happen weekly.  Like those who have affected real people including Mason Jones and Stephanie Smith both of whom were severely affected by E. coli O157. Tragically, Mason died at only 5 years of age and Stephanie, who is now 23, will probably never walk again.  The numbers, while nice, don’t really do these stories justice.

     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: March 1st, 2010 - 5:48pm by Doug Powell

    Does the majority of foodborne illness really happen in the home?

    The statement is repeatedly repeated, but usually with no supporting data.

    A story most recently proclaimed, “More than 50 percent of foodborne illnesses come from food prepared in the home.”

    There was no reference.

    The stats that have been reported in peer-reviewed journals are all over the place: anywhere from 15-90 per cent of foodborne illness apparently happens in the home.

    So if a consumer ate bagged spinach in fall 2006 at home, would that mean they possibly got sick at home, or that the contamination originated on the farm and there was little consumers could do?

    Casey Jacob and I attempted to tackle this question in the journal, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, and concluded,

    “Rather than focusing on the location of consumption—and blaming consumers and others—analysis of the steps leading to foodborne illness should center on the causes of contamination in a complex farm-to-fork food safety system.”

    Robert Tauxe of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control noted in a recent talk there have been 10 new food vehicles indentified in multistate outbreaks of foodborne illness since 2006: bagged spinach, carrot juice, peanut butter, broccoli powder on a snack food, dog food, pot pies, canned chili sauce, hot peppers, white pepper and raw cookie dough.

    Few, if any of these have to do with consumers.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share